
Impact of House passed legislation on health industries organizations
Summary of the impact of House passed legislation on the pharmaceutical, life sciences, medtech and health services sectors including PwC key observations.
October 2024
In Private Letter Ruling 202440007 (PLR), the IRS issued a ruling to a corporation (taxpayer), which elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT). The IRS held that the REIT income and asset testing requirements are met when, during the applicable testing periods, a REIT did not earn any income or hold any assets.
This is the first PLR addressing whether a REIT failed or passed the REIT income or asset tests when, during the applicable periods, the REIT held no assets and/or earned no income. The ruling concludes that a REIT did not fail REIT income and asset testing requirements due to not holding any assets or earning any income.
Taxpayers forming new REITs that have not yet acquired assets and/or will not generate gross income for any tax year may want to consider obtaining their own rulings for purposes of determining if they will pass the REIT gross income and asset tests in such years.
A REIT must meet certain requirements regarding the income it receives and the assets it holds. The income requirements must be met annually, while the asset requirements must be met quarterly. The income requirements dictate that on an annual basis, at least 75% of a REIT’s total gross income must come from certain real estate-related sources and at least 95% of a REIT’s total gross income must come from a broader set of real estate-related sources and certain types of passive income. The asset requirements include a requirement that at the close of each quarter, at least 75% of the value of a REIT’s total assets must consist of certain real estate assets, cash and cash items, and government securities.
The taxpayer was a corporation that elected to be taxed as a REIT in its initial tax year. Parent, a partnership for US federal income tax purposes, that had an ownership interest in the taxpayer, sought to issue equity to the taxpayer in exchange for cash to allow the taxpayer to acquire an interest in certain multi-family properties. However, due to investor and regulatory delays, the parent was unable to contribute the cash to the taxpayer until its second tax year. Thus, the taxpayer had no gross income from any source, and no assets, at any point prior to year two.
The taxpayer engaged a firm to prepare its initial year tax return. The firm did not communicate any issues with the taxpayer’s ability to satisfy the tests for REIT qualification, and the taxpayer filed a Form 1120-REIT for its initial tax year showing zero dollars' worth of assets and zero dollars of total income. At a later date, another firm was engaged by parent to perform audit services for taxpayer who was qualified in REIT-related matters. The second firm advised the taxpayer that it was unclear whether a REIT could have satisfied the REIT tests if the REIT did not have any gross income or assets in a particular year and advised that the taxpayer would be precluded from electing REIT status for a five-year period if it did not qualify in its initial tax year. To resolve these issues, the taxpayer sought a ruling to be treated as if the taxpayer had not made a REIT election in that year, considering that the taxpayer did not earn any gross income or hold any assets during the initial tax year.
The IRS ruled that the taxpayer’s lack of assets and income in its initial tax year did not cause the taxpayer to fail the REIT income and asset tests in that year. The IRS reasoned that 95% and 75% of the taxpayer’s gross income, under Sections 856(c)(2) and (c)(3) respectively, of $0 and $0 equaled $0, and similarly the value of the taxpayer’s total assets in year one was $0 and 75% of $0 equals $0.
In so ruling, the IRS looked to the legislative history of the REIT provisions and noted that the central concern of the REIT income tests was ensuring that most of a REIT’s gross income consisted of passive income and not whether the REIT had gross income in the first instance. Similarly, the asset testing was designed to ensure that the majority of a REIT’s investments are in real estate, rather than whether the REIT held any assets in the first place.
Applying the legislative intent to the enacted REIT income test regulations, the ruling concluded that the taxpayer’s lack of any income in its first year, or assets at the end of particular quarters, did not cause it to fail the REIT income tests at those times.
Observation: This has been a lingering question raised over the years by REITs and their tax advisors with newly formed REITs that had not acquired properties or earned any income. As a result, newly formed REITs, or REITs developing properties, may have been advised to acquire income-generating assets that would ensure that the REIT generated qualifying income and had qualifying assets. The ruling is welcome guidance and may provide comfort to REITs and tax advisors to the extent a REIT does not have income or assets for a particular year or quarter.
Summary of the impact of House passed legislation on the pharmaceutical, life sciences, medtech and health services sectors including PwC key observations.
The House-passed HR 1 proposes major changes for financial services, including limits on PTE tax, a higher SALT cap, and increasing US tax for certain inbound investors.
House-passed “One Big Beautiful Bill” includes significant information reporting provisions
Washington legislation includes significant tax changes including for B&O tax, sales and use tax, and capital gains tax.