Bermuda provides clarifying details regarding its proposed corporate income tax

November 2023

In brief

The Government of Bermuda, on November 15, issued its third public consultation paper (PCP), including draft legislation, proposing a 15% corporate income tax (CIT) applicable to Bermuda tax-resident entities and permanent establishments that are part of multinational enterprise (MNE) groups with annual revenue of at least €750M. The tax would be effective beginning in 2025.

Consistent with the first and second public consultations, one of the primary policy underpinnings associated with the CIT, as reflected in the third PCP, is alignment with the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules and qualification as a Covered Tax. However, Bermuda currently has no proposals to introduce the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) or the Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR).

Action item: Insurance MNE groups that may become subject to the CIT should be aware of Bermuda’s tight deadline to enact it. In light of the deadline, they should analyze the third PCP to assess how the proposed tax could affect their Bermuda Constituent Entities (BCEs) and assess whether to provide comments to the Bermuda Government. Comments with respect to the third PCP have been requested by November 30, 2023. The Bermuda Government intends to table the CIT bill for debate with a view to enactment prior to December 31, 2023.

Observation: In anticipation of enactment, affected MNE groups should analyze the potential tax accounting implications of the proposed CIT for 2023 year-end financial reporting. The impact of the proposed CIT regime on Bermuda insurance companies’ regulatory capital requirements also should be considered, along with the impact on M&A or other transactions. Additionally, insurance MNEs should monitor the CIT rules and expected guidance over the coming weeks and months as a part of determining whether to elect out of the Economic Transition Adjustment (ETA) and make other available tax elections. The third PCP changes many of the default positions with respect to available elections.

In detail

The third PCP provides details with respect to the scope of the proposed CIT, including the computation of taxable income and the tax itself. Many of the proposed rules were announced in the second PCP. Below are some of the changes and related details.

Scope

The second PCP provided that Bermuda entities that are members of MNE groups with limited international presence under Article 9.3.2 of the GloBE rules would be excluded from the Bermuda CIT. The third PCP specifies that this exclusion will not apply to entities that are subject to the GloBE IIR.

Observation: Including entities that are subject to the IIR is consistent with Bermuda’s stated objective of collecting taxes that otherwise would be payable to other jurisdictions. While the exclusion has been narrowed so that entities subject to the IIR are subject to the Bermuda CIT, the opposite is not true. Entities that are not subject to the IIR or the UTPR may be subject to Bermuda CIT. Bermuda MNE groups are expected to be subject to the Bermuda CIT even if they do not contain entities located in jurisdictions that have adopted GloBE rules beyond the initial five-year exclusion for in-scope groups with a limited international presence.

Calculation of taxable income

Annual adjustments to determine taxable income

A BCE’s Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss (FANIL) would be adjusted for certain items, many of which are consistent with the GloBE rules. In particular, the third PCP updates guidance on the ETA. The second PCP permitted an elective ETA upon entry into the CIT regime, with respect to a BCE’s assets and liabilities (except goodwill) held as of September 30, 2023. The third PCP changes the default position, such that the ETA applies, unless a Bermuda constituent entity elects out of its application.

Operating loss carryforward and matching adjustment do not apply to pre-ETA periods, unless the entity has elected out of the ETA

The matching adjustment allows unmatched mark-to-market movements included in FANIL, related to embedded derivatives for withheld assets under reinsurance agreements, to be excluded from taxable income as timing items. An opening tax loss carryforward allows for the carryforward of losses incurred in the five fiscal years preceding the effective date. The third PCP clarifies that the matching adjustment and the opening tax loss carryforward do not apply to periods prior to October 1, 2023, unless an election not to apply the ETA is made. Further guidance regarding the application of the matching election and opening tax loss carryforward is expected.

The draft legislation also confirms that the special 10-year spread deduction for IFRS 17 and LDTI transition losses cannot be made, unless a BCE has elected out of the ETA.  

Observation: After release of the second PCP, there was uncertainty as to how the opening tax loss carryforward and other tax adjustments would interact with the ETA. The third PCP has addressed this uncertainty by specifying that the matching adjustment and opening tax loss carryforward cannot apply to pre-ETA periods, unless the entity has elected out of the ETA. In addition, a BCE cannot claim a 10-year spread deduction for IFRS 17 and LDTI transition losses, unless it elects out of the ETA. Affected MNE groups will need to analyze and compare the different transition options, and determine which combination of elections they intend to make.

Foreign tax credits

The third PCP confirms that adjusted creditable foreign taxes generally follow the approach in the GloBE rules to calculate adjusted covered taxes for a constituent entity (including allocations from main entities in the case of permanent establishments and CFC regime taxes). It also confirms that there is no carryback or carryforward of unused credits. The third PCP also notes that the government continues to consider its rules regarding the allocation of CFC regime taxes.

Observation: MNE groups with non-Bermuda taxes (e.g., US federal income taxes or excise taxes) allocated to their Bermuda constituent entities should consider the available tax elections in terms of how they affect their ability to use foreign tax credits in a given year, and monitor developments regarding the allocation of CFC regime taxes.

See also

For prior coverage of this issue, please refer to our Tax Insight, “Proposed Bermuda corporate income tax is closely modeled after the GloBE rules, with key differences” (October 13, 2023).

Contact us

Ed Geils

Ed Geils

Global and US Tax Knowledge Management Leader, PwC US

Follow us