{{item.videoDuration}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.videoDuration}}
{{item.text}}
Private capital markets are evolving, but for private company leaders, the real question is: what do you do differently now? While deal value has increased and activity has picked up in certain areas, conditions remain uneven across the middle market. These shifts aren’t abstract; they’re showing up in day-to-day decisions about where to invest, how to run the business, how to think about tax, and how owners plan for the future.
Whether a company is founder-owned, family-owned, closely held, or sponsor-backed, leaders should consider how today’s market is changing both near-term decisions and long-term value. Based on what we’re seeing across clients in our PwC Private practice, here are five actions leaders may want to consider.
1. Reassess your capital strategy as hold timelines evolve
Many private companies have been on a longer path than expected toward refinance or exit. With deals conditions still inconsistent, many portfolio companies remain in extended hold periods. What’s changed is not just the timeline, but the expectation around how value is created during that hold, with more focus on both structural and operational levers to sustain performance over a longer period.
Owners and management teams are directing more attention, and capital, towards running the business better, especially with AI. Companies aren’t just talking about AI; they’re using it to improve customer experience, support finance teams, and drive efficiency. At the same time, sponsors are paying more attention to things like tax, HR alignment, and ERP systems, areas that may have received less attention when hold periods were expected to be shorter.
We’re also seeing more companies step back and ask: does our structure still make sense? Simplifying entities can improve transparency and governance, and even strengthen performance, but it needs to be done carefully to avoid unintended tax consequences.
At the end of the day, this is still about value creation, but with more discipline around where capital goes and what it’s expected to deliver. With extended holds becoming more likely, the near-term focus potentially should be on strengthening the business and building resilience, not just positioning for the next transaction.
Actions to consider: Pressure-test your capital plan against a longer hold: where are you investing to drive operational value (e.g., AI, systems, talent), and where is complexity no longer justified? For example, are you maintaining a legacy system that’s more costly than useful, or operating with an org structure that slows down decision-making? Then, consider aligning leadership and sponsors on a clear set of value creation priorities for the next 12–24 months. As capital, operating, and ownership decisions become more interconnected, staying coordinated across stakeholders becomes even more important to executing on those priorities.
2. Align operating decisions with owner-level planning priorities
As timelines stretch, ownership and liquidity questions are coming up much earlier in the operating conversation. Leaders are asking how decisions around structure, compensation, and capital deployment will affect long-term outcomes, not only at the company level, but also for shareholders and owners.
More of these day-to-day decisions now directly impact both owners and sponsors. Compensation structures, distribution policies, reinvestment decisions, and entity simplification can have implications at the owner level. Business decisions should lead, but understanding tax impacts early can help avoid unintended consequences later. Tax is not just a compliance consideration; it can influence structure, timing, and after-tax returns in ways that directly affect performance.
And now, with M&A activity picking up in certain segments, some executives and owners are monetizing equity positions for the first time. Illiquid ownership is turning into cash, which shifts the conversation. Leadership teams are thinking more intentionally about attracting and retaining talent by structuring compensation to provide incentives and greater liquidity. Those decisions can affect upper-tier ownership and equity design and require close coordination with sponsors.
Actions to consider: Bring tax, ownership, liquidity and HR considerations into key operating decisions early, before you lock in a structure or compensation plan. Sit down regularly with your tax advisors and sponsors to model how compensation, distributions, and structure decisions play out at both the company and owner level.
3. Build flexibility into your liquidity planning
Liquidity today rarely comes from a single, clean exit. We’re seeing more options, including recapitalizations, minority investments, structured deals, continuation vehicles, refinancings, and add-ons. There’s no one “right” path anymore, and many companies are navigating several at once. Larger private companies, in particular, are keeping IPO readiness on the table while also exploring private options.
The investor landscape is shifting too. Family capital is playing a bigger role in many transactions, often with different expectations around returns and timing than traditional private equity, which can influence ownership dynamics and decision-making.
Whether the opportunity is an IPO window, a strategic sale, or a family capital transaction, prepared companies can move decisively. Those that haven’t maintained reporting discipline, structural clarity, and thoughtful tax modeling often find themselves reacting instead of leading.
Actions to consider: Map out two or three realistic liquidity paths (e.g., minority investment, recap, IPO) and define what “ready” looks like for each — financials, reporting, tax structure, and governance. Then, close the biggest gaps, so you’re not scrambling when a window opens.
4. Elevate tax from compliance to strategy
Tax has become a more integrated part of how decisions are made. The environment is more complex than it was even a few years ago, and leaders are getting more involved.
We’re seeing earlier conversations about entity structure and associated impacts, such as interest deductibility, R&D, and international tax considerations. Looking at tax in isolation doesn’t work anymore. A decision that helps in one area can create issues somewhere else.
At the same time, many companies are realizing they don’t have enough internal in-depth knowledge of tax to keep up with that complexity. Some are adding resources, while many others are leaning more heavily on advisors, but either way, the model is changing.
Actions to consider: Assign clear ownership of tax strategy internally and any external support needed to effectively manage it – someone responsible for connecting tax to business, transaction, and structure decisions. That means building more tax capability, whether by adding dedicated professionals, reallocating resources, and in many cases working more extensively with advisors, including in a managed service capacity. Finally, revisit your entity structure and key tax positions annually to make sure they still align with how the business is evolving.
5. Prepare for the governance that comes with wealth
For founders, family owners, and key executives, M&A activity and business growth can create complexity that goes well beyond the business. Liquidity events can create new wealth for these stakeholders, raising important questions about capital deployment, estate planning, and philanthropic initiatives, such as the creation of family foundations or the pursuit of similar non-profit goals.
For many families, this shift brings a broader governance conversation to the forefront, as highlighted in our recent US Family Business Survey. A thoughtful family governance model, alignment on long-term objectives, and coordination of estate and tax reviews become increasingly important as wealth transitions from an operating company to a diversified capital base.
For many founders, family owners, and executives experiencing liquidity events for the first time, the challenge is no longer just about building value, but about putting the right structures in place to manage it over time.
Actions to consider: Schedule a planning meeting with your key stakeholders (e.g., founder, spouse, or partner), and at least one trusted advisor. Come prepared with three decisions drafted in advance: who will have authority over major capital decisions; your primary objectives for enhancing or preserving liquidity (and your short-term plan for deploying them); and whether the appropriate advisors, with the requisite skills, are in place to help you plan the exit and redeploy capital. Answering these three questions clearly can position you well to move forward.
Bringing it together: From capital trends to company decisions
Taken together, these developments and related actions reflect a shift in how decisions are made. Leaders are rethinking where capital goes, and investing more intentionally in value creation, while bringing owner and sponsor priorities into operating decisions earlier, and planning for multiple paths to liquidity.
At the same time, tax is moving closer to the center of decision-making, with clearer ownership and stronger alignment with growth and transaction strategies. And as liquidity events approach, more focus is being placed on how wealth will be structured, governed, and managed across generations. Taking thoughtful steps now can help companies respond more quickly and more confidently when conditions shift or transaction opportunities emerge.
In today’s private capital environment, this kind of preparation is a competitive advantage, and one that we’re seeing clients across our PwC Private practice prioritize more intentionally. If you’re considering how these trends may affect your business or ownership strategy, we welcome the opportunity to connect and continue the conversation.
{{filterContent.facetedTitle}}
{{contentList.loadingText}}
{{contentList.loadingText}}
Follow us
