Repackaging responsibility: What your company should know about EPR packaging laws

  • Blog
  • 8 minute read
  • September 16, 2025

David Linich

Sustainability Principal, PwC US

Megan Haas

Director, Sustainability Consulting, PwC US

Rebecca Guerriero

Director, Sustainability Consulting, PwC US

Packaging waste is no longer just a problem for states, cities and municipalities — it’s becoming a corporate one as well. Across the US, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations are making companies more accountable for the packaging they place on the market. These regulations shift the end-of-life burden of packaging waste away from municipalities and toward producers, creating new cost obligations to fund recycling systems and requirements to design recyclable products.

EPR laws aren’t new. They’ve existed in the US for more than two decades across various sectors — from textiles and electronics to pharmaceuticals. Now, though, there has been a marked uptick in packaging-focused regulations across multiple states in part to address the growing cost and space burden of packaging waste. As a result, businesses are navigating a complex and evolving landscape: a patchwork of state-led rules, SKU-level data requirements, divergent infrastructure realities and eco-modulation, which is the practice of adjusting EPR fees based on products’ environmental performance or packaging. For organizations ready to engage early, there’s an upside: a chance to redesign packaging, control costs and capture a potential 6% to 25% revenue uplift from increased sales volume and market share, new product offerings and pricing premiums for sustainable goods versus those products without such an emphasis.

Strategy Understanding EPR laws: Turning regulation into a competitive edge

The US EPR landscape is fragmented — and fast-moving. Seven states, including California, Oregon and Washington, have enacted packaging-focused legislation. Five more, from Illinois to Rhode Island, are close behind with bills under active consideration. For companies operating nationally, that means managing regulatory complexity across jurisdictions with differing timelines, data formats and fee structures. Managing this variability often starts with visibility: tracking state-level developments and building the flexibility to adapt quickly as rules evolve.

While program details vary, the mechanics are similar. Once a state passes EPR legislation, it typically designates a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) to oversee the program and engage with companies. Producers — usually the brand owner or manufacturer — register with the PRO and submit detailed packaging data each year. This includes weight, material type, recycled content, brand names, recyclability and volume sold. That data is then used to calculate compliance fees based on the volume of covered products.

Reporting requirements, thresholds, definitions of “producer” and “covered product,” and deadlines vary by state, making close analysis key to confirm compliance​. Penalties for non-compliance — such as failure to register, report or pay fees — can accumulate quickly and vary significantly between states.

Compliance Four moves producers can make now

Strategic EPR compliance often starts with a proactive mindset. From understanding individual jurisdictional requirements to enhancing packaging and operations to help reduce costs, companies should consider four key steps:

Understanding whether your company is subject to EPR laws requires navigating a complex set of criteria, including brand ownership, revenue thresholds, product types and how goods are manufactured, sold and distributed. Begin by understanding where — and how — you’re exposed. Staying ahead involves regularly monitoring regulatory timelines and assigning accountability to cross-functional teams that have data ownership and are responsible for determining whether your company is in scope as a producer. As new regulations are passed, evaluate which products are covered. From there, engage early with PROs to understand developing program requirements — by reaching out you may be able to help shape them. The sooner you get involved, the more strategic your reporting decisions can become.

Determine the required data points (such as material type, weight, PCR content and recyclability) for each relevant market and data sources (suppliers and internal systems). You’ll need to assess their capacity to provide reliable and complete information. Then evaluate your ability to expand pre-existing vendor, information and technology systems to gather standardized packaging data by SKU and location.

Evaluate your company's data management maturity and choose appropriate tools, such as working with your existing technology stack, adding ERP modules, SaaS solutions or custom-built solutions to help organize and unify data and forecast obligations.

Don’t underestimate the challenge of aggregating data across locations, systems or from various suppliers. Implement rules to create consistency and efficiency across jurisdictions. Consider expanding your data tools and models to suppliers to enable easier integration and think through what changes may be required to operational processes to sustain reporting. Proactive engagement and clear communication can be critical.

AI-enabled workstreams and tools may also help automate the refinement of data, distilling it into actionable outputs for reporting, forecasting or scenario planning which can enable informed decision-making later.

Simultaneously, evaluate your packaging portfolio for regulatory risks and opportunities. Use the data foundation you’re building to help inform and identify where eco-modulation could affect the total cost of ownership, and where your company may benefit from design changes. As companies rank potential projects based on ROI, it’s important to understand how EPR fees can alter the equation. Companies may be potentially caught off guard when they realize the fee impact.

With solutions in place, use sales and packaging data to model potential EPR fees by jurisdiction. This will likely be challenging initially and may require coordination across the value chain for information on packaging data. AI can serve as a valuable asset for demand planning by analyzing historical data alongside external factors — such as weather patterns and market trends — to better forecast consumer demand and optimize projections for products and their packaging needs.

Then, integrate these forecasts into annual planning and create strategic packaging transformation plans by SKU to help reduce fees and meet future compliance obligations. This information can also inform your reporting at the producer level, and these tools can enable you to generate reports on SKU-level packaging data for submission to local PROs.

If your company exceeds EPR minimum requirements in a given state, you can then focus on continuing to mature and refine your process for compliance. State-level EPR laws often include eco-modulation incentives, in the form of bonuses (e.g., credits) or maluses (e.g., penalties or higher fees associated with a higher environmental burden) applied to the producer’s base fees for a particular packaging material and to make enhancements to or switch packaging materials. For example, conducting product-level life cycle analyses (LCAs) may provide further fee reductions for companies in Oregon. Through these incentives, the programs aim to drive innovations in packaging design, production and material selection that can lead to continual impact reductions.

Consider this example: If your product uses a plastic bottle made of PET, how would your organization’s EPR fees change if you switch to using more post-consumer recycled content (PCR) in this packaging? The exact method for calculating and awarding eco-modulation incentives vary by jurisdiction and guidance is evolving. In the illustrated example, increasing recycled content to 50% and conducting an LCA proving reduced impact can translate to lower fees.

This example shows one approach to how EPR compliance can drive value for your company. Adjusting your packaging may involve considerations such as the availability of PCR content or other feedstocks, as well as potential cost increases associated with switching primary materials. Collaboration with local PROs and providers across the value chain can support implementation.

This example illustrates one approach to implementing EPR compliance for your company. Adjusting your packaging may involve considerations such as the availability of PCR content or other feedstocks, as well as potential cost increases associated with switching primary materials. Collaboration with local PROs and providers across the value chain can support implementation.

Accountability in the Value Chain How packaging manufacturers can strengthen long-term relationships and help customers reduce costs

Although the formal EPR reporting responsibility lies with producers (e.g., brand owners), these laws are likely to impact business models for packaging manufacturers and reshape their relationships with their customers.

As those customers face financial and reporting obligations based on the recyclability, material type, and volume of packaging they place on the market, manufacturers may expect to see increased demand for recyclable and low-impact materials, requests for design modifications that align with eco-modulation fees and greater transparency and traceability in packaging composition and sourcing. There’s a payoff to this transformation — a 6% to 25% revenue uplift from expanded sales volume and market share, new product offerings and pricing premiums for sustainability-marketed products.

Manufacturers can stand out by:

  • Delivering material and compliance transparency
    Transparency isn’t just a value-add — it’s becoming a requirement. Under emerging EPR laws, customers will likely need granular data on packaging type, weight and recycled content to fulfill reporting obligations. Manufacturers that maintain detailed documentation — such as material specs, recyclability certifications or post-consumer recycled (PCR) content sheets — can simplify compliance for customers while building trust. Clear, standardized information doesn’t just help reduce administrative friction; it also helps customers pinpoint fee drivers and make better design decisions.
  • Offering sustainable packaging design services
    Packaging design decisions now come with price tags and incentives. Some EPR programs apply fee adjustments based on environmental impact: recyclable or compostable materials may reduce cost exposure, while hard-to-recycle formats can trigger penalties. Manufacturers that offer design tools, material guidance or pre-vetted packaging options can help customers make informed choices. Think lighter, simpler and more circular, avoiding materials like carbon black plastics or multi-layer films that often carry higher fees. Building a portfolio of low-fee packaging options tailored to different state programs can position manufacturers as essential strategic collaborators.
  • Going beyond manufacturing
    Manufacturers have an opportunity to lead — not just supply. By moving beyond transactional roles, packaging providers can become long-term collaborators in driving compliance and innovation. That could mean investing in next-generation materials like fiber-based or plant-derived packaging or piloting real-world use cases to evaluate performance. Just as important, sharing timely, standardized data — through dashboards or automated platforms — can reduce friction and help customers meet expanding reporting demands. The likely result: stronger customer relationships, greater trust, and packaging solutions built to adapt as regulations evolve.

Real World Impact Using compliance as a catalyst for creating strategic value

By treating EPR not merely as a compliance burden, companies can turn it into strategic advantage — helping to reduce fees, improve packaging costs, support broader sustainability initiatives and strengthen brand perception. In turn, they can capture a potential 6% to 25% revenue uplift from expanded sales volume, increased market share, new product offerings and pricing premiums for sustainability-marketed products.

Eco-modulation mechanisms reward sustainable packaging decisions. Actions like converting to recyclable materials, increasing PCR content, or conducting LCAs can reduce regulatory costs while improving environmental impact.

Redesigning packaging also provides opportunities for improvement. Reducing packaging size and implementing lightweight packaging materials or downgauging can lead to reduced material costs and logistics enhancement. Simplifying or removing unnecessary outer packaging and avoiding mixed materials can further reduce packaging weight and overall EPR costs.

These actions also support broader sustainability goals including the reduction of Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, microplastics, and removing chemicals of concern like BPA and PFAS. Developing a consistent system to track packaging types, recyclability, and materials across SKUs enables accurate EPR reporting which can also be leveraged to support other sustainability reporting requirements, such as CSRD, and further reduce regulatory exposure.

Furthermore, consumers care about sustainable products and packaging. According to studies, 90% of consumers are more likely to buy from brands with sustainable packaging1 and over half (54%) of respondents reported deliberately choosing products with sustainable packaging in the past six months. This consumer demand can have a direct impact on revenue. Research has shown that sustainability-marketed consumer packaged goods can command an average price premium of 26.6% over conventionally marketed products. Thus, a bold commitment to sustainability can make all the difference and communicating your sustainable packaging actions and building a narrative can be key, especially as one in five of Americans now live in states with packaging EPR regulations2.

Get started Build the foundation for EPR compliance now — or risk falling behind

Regulations are shifting. So are expectations — from regulators, customers and stakeholders alike. Companies that act now likely have an opportunity to strengthen compliance, reduce long-term costs and unlock brand value through smarter packaging decisions. That often starts with visibility: tracking legislative developments across states and markets like Canada, and assessing how your operations, data, and design choices align to emerging requirements.

Establishing a solid foundation includes more than checking boxes. It involves identifying in-scope products, evaluating current packaging data, and engaging with producer responsibility organizations (PROs). The earlier you move, the more flexibility you’ll likely have to shape reporting strategies and future-proof compliance efforts.

State of Decarbonization Report

What’s powering decarbonization — and what’s not

Drive value with sustainability

Capturing financial gains from decarbonization

Related content

Dive deep into PwC thought leadership for more on the insights you need to build resilience, drive growth, lower costs and offset capital investments with tax credits and incentives.

Contact us

David Linich

Sustainability Principal, PwC US

Megan Haas

Director, Sustainability Consulting, PwC US

Follow us