The current and potential effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and associated economic impacts will likely be felt long into the future. For the time being, though, bank treasurers are fighting fires that shift throughout the day such as managing liquidity impacts, evaluating new tools being offered by the Fed and monitoring seemingly countless policy changes such as adjustments in capital rules. To effectively deal with this environment, banks need visibility into the earnings impact from lower interest rates and balance sheet changes resulting from client draws on credit lines and deposit flows.
Liquidity buffer levels at most banks will change, but not necessarily in a consistent fashion since some banks will observe net outflows while others experience net inflows given customer “de-risking” and the flight to quality. For banks experiencing reductions in liquidity buffers, difficult balance sheet decisions will need to be made around the use of available liquidity to fund renewal of revolving lines and new extensions of credit. Coordination between business, treasury, and risk management is critical to recalibrate risk appetites for the road ahead.
Once we emerge from the stressed market conditions, there will be an opportunity to take a step back and rethink how analytics and decisioning-making capabilities can be improved to shape the longer-term strategy and help manage future crises. But for now, here are four actions you can take:
The sudden downward move of interest rates and client behavior resulting from market volatility requires fast, ad hoc analysis to support decisions like revisions to loan- and deposit-pricing strategies. The effectiveness of these strategies will directly impact the bank’s ability to mitigate margin pressure in a near-zero rate environment. Models and measurement tools at many banks are not dynamic enough to adequately meet this information need. As a result, many institutions will need to assemble task forces to manually retrieve and analyze client-level information on declining credit conditions and expected liquidity needs.
We don’t anticipate liquidity problems as clients draw on credit lines — especially given existing buffers and recent Fed actions to provide market liquidity — but banks are still pressed to manage changes in liquidity and recalibrate throughout the day. A dedicated task force will support this by segmenting portfolios to provide additional visibility into industry- or client-specific liquidity issues and analyze whether or not drawn cash remains within the bank as a deposit. Given resource limitations, treasurers should be quick to reallocate resources from noncritical projects to support analysis and meet reporting demands to executive management and the board of directors.
Immediate priorities are to fund the bank’s own portfolio and manage the earnings impact from the recent emergency interest rate cuts. There are immediate actions to take on both sides of the balance sheet that will vary in priority and impact depending on each bank’s profile:
Internally, executive management and board members expect continuous updates on the impact of the pandemic on the business. Business leaders should consider liquidity and capital implications of decisions to support clients and counterparties. Decisions to change risk appetite or reduce buffers cannot be made lightly and must adhere to formal risk governance, including board-level approval where necessary. Communication channels need to be kept open between business lines, treasury and risk, particularly as plans to provide support or relief to clients translate into delayed inflows or incremental outflows for the bank.
Externally, regulatory agencies are encouraging banks to use their capital and liquidity buffers yet expecting banks to have a close handle on sources and uses of cash and collateral with clear communication on differences relative to what was previously reported to regulators. In addition, individual institutions are sensitive to being an outlier in the use of these buffers for fear of sending a negative signal to the market. Institutions should project how these buffers might evolve as liquidity and credit needs change, while staying in close communication with regulators if they plan to approach or breach regulatory minimums or draw on Fed facilities.
There is no playbook for managing the unfolding market stress. Given the amount of economic uncertainty, banks should be developing and analyzing possible scenarios for the weeks and months ahead. Scenarios should include broad sets of outcomes and cover key questions concerning client needs, macroeconomic conditions, monetary policy, and fiscal stimulus. As examples, scenario analyses might evaluate:
The good news is that, given post-financial crisis reforms, large US banks have built ample liquidity and capital reserves designed to survive stressed conditions. However, the speed of how events are unfolding is putting this to the test and may show cracks in a bank’s ability to efficiently assess and determine optimized strategies for managing interest rate sensitivity, earnings, liquidity and capital. The conditions will also likely reveal the inadequacies of some liquidity and balance sheet planning models, and the challenges of operating in a prolonged near-zero interest rate environment. For now, take decisive measures to mitigate the risk. There will be opportunity later for a postmortem to understand what happened and determine how to improve going forward.
Principal, Financial Services Risk Practice, PwC US
Financial Services Advisory Regulatory Leader, PwC US
Managing Director, PwC US
Director, PwC US