Develop a stronger understanding of consumers: Owning the doctor’s visit is no longer enough

Footprint
  • May 2026

Consumerism in healthcare is no longer about winning the first patient interaction. It often means designing care and operating models around patient needs first, including outcomes, access, convenience, transparency, navigation, and continuity.

Full beds today can mask a loss of control tomorrow 

Pressures on the clinical workforce—labor shortages, widespread burnout, workplace safety concerns, persistent labor‑cost inflation—are well documented. Most hospitals face moderate to severe staffing shortages across multiple clinical roles, with substantial burnout among nurses and physicians.

Workplace safety risks remain acute. Healthcare and social assistance workers are five times as likely to experience workplace-violence injuries as workers overall.1 At the same time, hospital labor costs remain high with salaries for RNs growing faster than the rate of inflation. Looking ahead, new federal student-loan caps (and the federal government’s proposed new “professional degree” definition) could reduce enrollment in key health profession programs, including nursing, and worsen workforce shortages.

These are symptoms of a larger problem. Today’s clinical workforce operating model is out of sync with the realities of modern care. Technology can help, but lasting progress will require redesigning roles, workflows, and support systems to make clinical work sustainable again.  

Full beds today can mask a loss of control tomorrow

Health systems have invested in consumerism for years (portals, digital access, HCAHPS improvements) with uneven results.1 Federal and state policies have also supported greater transparency around price and quality. Many leaders are understandably skeptical of renewed calls to invest in additional consumer plays. Hospitals remain the destination for high‑acuity care. Trust is strong. Beds are full. From this viewpoint, leaders’ question is fair: What problem are we trying to solve?

The risk that providers may be missing

The problem isn’t demand today. It’s control of the journey tomorrow. Patients are widely dissatisfied.2 In our 2025 US Healthcare Consumer Insights Survey, 68% of respondents face barriers to access, 61% worry about affordability if they lose coverage, and 65% delay care until it becomes urgent, reflecting widespread friction, cost anxiety, and avoidance behavior.3 A national analysis of US hospital patient experience found that dissatisfaction is driven less by clinical care and more by breakdowns in communication, poor discharge processes, and slow responsiveness to patient needs.4

One reason that this dissatisfaction has not reshaped provider economics is that credible alternatives (such as digital-first providers) have largely been limited to low‑acuity care so far.5 Still, consumers are getting acclimated to looking for alternative providers. This shift reflects the broader reality that patients assess care across sites, settings, and time, from the first sniffle to the last medical bill. A provider that concentrates only on patient experience within the four walls of a visit misses significant pieces of what helps shape patient trust.  

Reasons to believe  

US healthcare is being reshaped by economic pressures, rapid advances in technology and medicine, shifting demographics, and changing consumer expectations around access, convenience, transparency, and control. As Americans turn to new ways to access care, four structural reasons help explain why embracing consumerism is no longer optional.

  • When entry points were limited, the funnel mattered less. That’s changing. For years, demand for hospital-based care was relatively resilient and the number of ways patients entered the system was small. Systems could grow volume without truly “buying” the funnel. Now, as consumer choices for care proliferate, the top of the funnel has widened significantly. The source and entry points of demand are moving across retail, virtual, DTC, and AI-mediated navigation. In this environment, success is often determined by staying relevant after entry and not by owning the various entry points. Providers who focus on orchestrating the journey (before, between, and after visits) will likely be better positioned to maintain visibility, influence routing, and preserve continuity than those relying on episodic touchpoints to regain control.
  • Enhancing the visit is no longer enough. Most providers have made meaningful improvements to the consumer experience. They’ve invested in online scheduling and check‑in, developed holistic digital portals, and elevated meal choices for patients and visitors. Some providers concentrate on specific groups of patients, studying their needs and the needs of their caregivers, and they’ve designed thoughtful experiences for them. These valuable initiatives focus on individual encounters without redesigning how care connects before, between, and after visits. They miss the points where frustration builds and patients leave to seek care elsewhere. Fragmented journeys can create disconnected handoffs, unclear next steps, and broken workflows that translate into manual work, rework, and hidden strains on the workforce. These visits also often sit outside of the wellness space, missing out on tremendous consumer activity.
  • AI is moving the front door and, increasingly, AI is the front door. AI is rapidly becoming the pre‑clinical sensemaking layer, helping shape symptom exploration, education, navigation, and expectations before a provider is consulted. As “Dr. AI” becomes the de facto starting point for many consumers, some health systems and technology vendors are exploring ways to bring that search behavior into the Electronic Health Records interface so clinicians can see what patients are asking before the visit. This shift won’t eliminate providers, but it can reshape their roles. You should understand how to care for consumers directed to you through AI, through a digital-first company prescribing GLP-1s, through an app designed to address perimenopause symptoms, or through a Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) laboratory. It’s also important that you understand what happens when those consumers are directed elsewhere, bypassing you altogether.
  • Small revenues don’t mean small stakes. DTC and virtual health companies remain relatively small, dwarfed by many hospitals and health systems providers in scale, revenue, clinical breadth and more. Many collect less revenue than the average, mid-size hospital. Still, for millions of Americans, these companies are setting expectations and behavior upstream. These players are winning business by offering convenience, emotional safety for conditions associated with stigma, clear pricing, and frequent in‑between‑visit engagement. Dismissing them as small and concerned only with low-acuity conditions misses the point. In fulfilling consumer needs, these players are influencing over key parts of the patient journey.  

Five no-regrets moves for a future-focused consumer strategy

The risk is not today’s performance but tomorrow’s loss of visibility and influence. Rather than reacting to disruption, anchor on these five no‑regrets moves that help safeguard control of the journey while building lasting advantage.

1. Own the journey, not the door.

Strive to design seamless handoffs from any starting point and maintain visibility into consumer intent and acuity over time. With clear navigation and proactive next steps, providers can stay present between visits with outreach when it matters. This is how providers can safeguard referral flow, enable value‑based economics, and remain the trusted source of care even when they may not be the first interaction.

Innovator’s move: Integrate the front door into a journey operating system that captures intent and acuity from any entry point and keeps the consumer in your sight between visits. A journey operating system is the set of workflows, data flows, and decision rules that determine who owns the next step, when outreach is triggered, and how handoffs happen across channels and settings. Done well, it connects digital signals (search, scheduling, portal behavior) with clinical context so your care teams can prioritize outreach, reduce numbers of patients who leave to seek care elsewhere, and make continuity measurable rather than assumed.  

2. Make “in‑between visit engagement” a core operating capability.

Make in‑between‑visit engagement a core operating capability, not a layer of outbound communications. At a population level, many consumers are managing chronic conditions with many small, daily decisions, resulting in evidence of progress and setbacks. Their experience of their illness is continuous, yet time‑constrained medical appointments generally focus on medication and acute issue resolution. The key moments that shape trust and outcomes often occur outside the visit. Even so, many organizations view these communications as holding little revenue value and manage them as reminders rather than care. Industry-leading systems view these communications as structured, condition‑based follow‑ups, embedding selective use of self‑reported and wearable data.

Innovator’s move: Build an always‑on engagement engine that listens between visits using self‑reported data, wearables, and signals of friction to intervene early and earn trust long before the next appointment.  

3. Segment for action, not messaging.

Recognize that different consumers require different journey investments and fund accordingly. Focused segmentation is being used effectively by DTC and digital‑first entrants that concentrate on specific need‑states and build disproportionate value. Segmentation creates value only when it shapes where and how resources are allocated, not how messages are tailored.

Innovator’s move: Design segmented journeys that extend beyond your walls by partnering, offloading, and orchestrating across ecosystems so resources follow need‑states, not organizational boundaries.  

4. Make hyper‑personalization practical without waiting for perfection.

Intake data, scheduling behavior, missed appointments, and Social Determinants of Health indicators can be used today to tailor journeys, anticipate needs, and intervene earlier if organizations are set up to act on them. The real constraint is the operating model: who owns personalization, how insights trigger action, and how teams coordinate across care, access, and engagement. Treating personalization as an enterprise capability (not a technology feature) can unlock meaningful impact quickly while building the foundation for more advanced capabilities over time.

Innovator’s move: Treat personalization as an enterprise autopilot. AI orchestrates cross‑team actions in real time, continuously adapting journeys using the data you already have, while governance defines the guardrails.  

5. Preserve trust.

Combine clinical, behavioral, consumer, and contextual data as strategic assets supported by trust and governance. The convergence of these data sources introduces real privacy, cybersecurity, and ethical risks that can erode consumer confidence if not tightly managed. Industry-leading organizations respond by establishing enterprise‑level data and AI governance, making transparency a competitive differentiator, and treating trust as a measurable outcome rather than a compliance exercise. The ability to govern data responsibly is what often allows providers to scale innovation without sacrificing credibility. Getting the foundation right, first, and early, allows for the value of data to be realized.

Innovator’s move: Refuse “shadow autonomy.” No model runs at scale without attestation, monitoring, audit‑readiness, and prompt governance—and each autonomous action is traceable, reviewable, and stoppable.  

Consumerism is no longer a CX upgrade. It’s a control system for demand, continuity, and trust in a multi‑door world.

As consumers form expectations, make decisions, and navigate care far beyond the walls of the hospital, influence is shifting upstream and outward. Those who delay investing in consumerism are quietly surrendering their relevance by allowing others to shape first steps, set expectations, and disintegrate continuity of care. In an environment defined by choice, fragmentation, and accelerating technological intermediation, you should embrace consumerism to protect trust, maintain relevance, and gain control.

1. PwC, “2025 US Healthcare Consumer Insights Survey,” Oct. 20, 2025. www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/health-industries/library/healthcare-consumer-insights-survey.html

2. Ruth Igielnik and Kate Zernike, “When Voters Worry About ‘Affordability,’ Many Point to Health Care,” New York Times, March 23, 2026. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/us/politics/when-voters-worry-about-affordability-many-point-to-health-care.html.

3. PwC, “2025 US Healthcare Consumer Insights Survey,” (see footnote 1)

4. Man Hung, Sharon Vu, Eric S. Hon, Logan Reese, Jacob Gardner, and Martin S. Lipsky, “Unveiling the drivers of patient satisfaction in the United States hospitals: Assessing quality indicators across regions,” PLOS One (2025): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324737

5. PwC, “2025 US Healthcare Consumer Insights Survey,” (see footnote 1)  

Follow us