Our Take
Administration and Congressional majority alignment on display. Despite some criticism from Democrats, all of the nominees are likely to be confirmed as soon as the Senate can organize the necessary votes. Accordingly, the Republican majority in Congress is set to have close allies at the regulatory agencies to work towards joint goals of advancing digital asset innovation, eliminating business activity-based debanking and streamlining regulatory requirements. Having similar topics addressed by both Gould and Atkins demonstrated that these initiatives will be promoted across the financial ecosystem. For example, as the OCC seeks to be more permissive of lawful digital asset activities by banks, the SEC will seek to clarify the framework that defines the legality of these activities for digital asset companies.
Supervision is changing focus, not going away. With experience at both the regulatory agencies and Congress, these nominees have a demonstrated respect for upholding safety, soundness and investor protection. While it is clear that the agencies may depart from the Biden Administration’s approach to digital assets and ESG, financial institutions should remember that supervisors intend to still identify and penalize violations in areas like financial risk management and fraud. The new agency leaders may also find it difficult to undo relatively mature requirements. For example, Atkins will likely address some CAT requirements to protect privacy and reduce costs but is less likely to remove it altogether as it replaced fragmented audit trails and reporting has been in place since the last Trump Administration. However, while Atkins said that he would retain fines as an enforcement mechanism, he is likely to reduce their scale and focus penalties on individuals rather than shareholders.
Our Take
Back to the drawing board. The rescission of the 2023 CRA rule was expected following legal challenges, industry opposition, and recent statements from regulators. While the industry, regulators, and community groups all agree that modernizing the 48-year-old CRA to account for digital banking and provide transparency into activities that meet CRA obligations is past due, many objected to the way the rule modified assessment areas, the complexity of required calculations and data collection, and the supervisory discretion afforded by the rule. The Agencies have stated that they will work together to promote a consistent CRA approach but considering the challenges of coordination and complex considerations necessary to propose a new framework, alongside expected cuts to agency staff, we do not expect to see a new proposal any time soon. In the meantime, concerns with the pre-October 2023 CRA framework remain, including an outdated assessment area framework in the age of digital banking and an informal – and often inconsistent – process to clarify CRA activities. However, financial institutions are well accustomed to these challenges and are expected to [KA1] be relieved to maintain their mature CRA compliance programs – for now.
These actions follow personnel decisions by Pulte that include dismissing several Board members and executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a return-to-office mandate. Pulte was also installed at the Board Chair of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Our Take
Pulte has set a course for the FHFA in line with the Administration’s priorities. The steps taken by Pulte over the past two weeks follow now-familiar themes from speeches and actions at other financial agencies, including loosening “burdensome” requirements, eliminating climate and “DEI” expectations, and refocusing on core agency missions. While many of these actions appear at face value to significantly reduce compliance expectations and eliminate certain programs, their practical impact is expected to be more limited. For example, bank supervisors and state attorneys general can continue to enforce against unfair, deceptive and abusive acts and practices; rental flexibility and lease notice requirements are required by many states; and climate risk remains an important consideration under areas such as credit risk. In what has become a theme under the new Administration, while agency expectations may be categorized differently, the outcome of firms’ risk decisions and consumer practices still matter.
These notable developments hit our radar recently:
FDIC rescinds prior notification crypto requirement. On March 28th, the FDIC rescinded its 2022 Financial Institution Letter (FIL) that established a requirement for FDIC-supervised institutions that wish to engage in crypto-related activities to notify the FDIC before doing so. The rescission is accompanied by clarification that FDIC-supervised institutions may engage in permissible crypto-related activities without receiving prior approval.
CFTC withdraws crypto guidance. On March 28th, the CFTC withdrew two staff advisories, one on virtual currency derivative product listings and another on risks related to clearing digital assets. The CFTC states that the withdrawals reflect additional experience with virtual currency derivatives and to clarify that its regulatory treatment of these products may [KA1] not vary from its treatment of others.
SEC stops defending climate disclosures. On March 27th, the SEC voted to end its legal defense of rules requiring disclosure of climate-related risks and greenhouse gas emissions. Following the vote, the agency sent a letter to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals stating that the agency withdraws its defense of the rules.
CFPB to settle late fee rule litigation. On March 24th, a federal judge in the Northern District of Texas Federal Court granted the CFPB 30 days to settle a lawsuit challenging the agency’s credit card late fee rule. CFPB attorneys have stated that they are optimistic that an agreement with the plaintiffs can be reached.
CFPB to revoke “buy now, pay later” rule. On March 26th, the CFPB requested to stay litigation against the agency’s interpretive rule that would extend credit card protections to “buy now, pay later” purchases, explaining that the agency intends to revoke the rule.
CFPB vacates settlement against mortgage lender. On March 26th, the CFPB announced that it will vacate a settlement against a mortgage lender and return the associated monetary penalty. As part of the announcement, the agency criticized the previous Administration finding evidence of discrimination based on racial disparities in mortgage applications as opposed to specific instances of discriminatory conduct.
Senate votes to overturn CFPB overdraft rule. On March 27th, the Senate passed a resolution under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn a CFPB rule limiting overdraft fees. The House must also approve the resolution for the rule to be overturned. If the rule is struck down, the CFPB would be prohibited from issuing a “substantially similar” rule without Congressional approval.
Acting Comptroller speaks on innovation and affordable credit. On March 27h, OCC Acting Comptroller Rodney Hood spoke on the role of innovative financial technology to promote financial inclusion for underserved communities. He explained that the agency will refocus initiatives such as Project REACh to focus on financial inclusion, for example by developing alternative credit metrics for consumers lacking a credit score.
Uyeda and Cook speak at SIFMA conference. At this week’s SIFMA C&L Annual Seminar, Acting SEC Chairman Mark Uyeda and FINRA President Robert Cook offered remarks on their accomplishments and future policy goals. Uyeda highlighted actions to delay and revisit rulemaking such as expanded central Treasury clearing and urged the industry to provide feedback. Cook outlined priorities including updating the FINRA rulebook, seeking amendments to securities lending and TRACE reporting, and helping firms with fraud and cybersecurity protections.