{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.text}}
Consumers and businesses are increasingly relying on voice assistants, AI chatbots, and autonomous AI agents to find information and complete transactions, even in a complex space like banking. This means search engine optimization (SEO) is no longer sufficient. This is giving rise to new disciplines like answer engine optimization (AEO) and generative engine optimization (GEO) alongside SEO. At the same time, agentic commerce — where AI agents act on behalf of users to shop, recommend and transact — is poised to redefine how customers discover and purchase financial products.
These developments require a reimagining of a bank’s customer engagement model for both consumer and corporate clients. Organizations that evolve their digital marketing and customer experience to be ready for the new frontier of search will be best positioned to capture growth.
Search behavior is evolving rapidly. Where once a search led to a list of links, now users receive direct answers or AI-generated summaries without ever clicking a blue link to reach a website. Let’s clarify the key concepts and why this shift matters:
Search engine optimization: SEO focuses on improving visibility in organic search results. Climbing up in the rankings involves keyword strategy, meta tags, backlink building, technical site health and relevant content. SEO has been the cornerstone of digital marketing for banks aiming to reach people searching for specific financial products like “best savings account rates.”
Answer engine optimization: In a subtle shift from SEO, the idea behind AEO is to have the content be the answer itself, with the link being of secondary importance. In several cases this requires structuring content but also making the content conversational and concise so answer engines can address natural-language questions by easily extracting the answer. Instead of a generic page targeting “mortgage rates,” for example, a bank might create content that directly answers, “What are today’s 30-year mortgage rates for first-time buyers?”
Generative engine optimization: Often used interchangeably with AEO, GEO refers to restructuring content for AI-driven generative search results. With the emergence of generative AI (GenAI) in search, queries can return synthesized answers compiled from multiple sources rather than a list of links. The aim is to increase the probability of your information being included in those AI-generated summaries and recommendations.
Whether we call it AEO or GEO, the objective is to become the trusted source that AI platforms cite or recommend. If a user asks an AI assistant “What’s the best checking account in Dallas?”, the strategic goal is to have the AI answer include your bank’s account details (and hopefully cited), rather than being absent from the conversation.
Traditional SEO remains important, but its effectiveness is changing. Zero-click searches could mean customers are getting answers to their questions without visiting your site. As AI answers proliferate, individuals might not even see the source websites unless they check citations. For your bank, that could mean two very different outcomes. On one hand, being the snippet or AI-cited source confers authority and can yield traffic or leads (as users trust the AI’s recommendations). On the other hand, if your bank doesn’t appear in those results, you may be completely bypassed by a prospective customer. Consider if a prospect asks an AI engine, “What are the top 5 small business loan providers and their rates?” If your bank’s offering isn’t part of the answer, that prospect might never know about it — even if you had a great webpage that appeared in traditional search results.
What does it practically mean to optimize for answer engines and generative engines?
Parallel to the transformation in search is an equally disruptive trend in commerce — the advent of agentic commerce. As defined in our recent retail disruption perspective:
“Agentic commerce refers to a new way of shopping powered by AI agents: software systems, usually powered by GenAI, designed to act on a user’s behalf. Unlike traditional chatbots, AI agents don’t just respond to prompts. They can browse, compare and even initiate purchases based on the user’s goals, preferences and constraints.”
Much of the agentic commerce discussion revolves around how retailers may be affected. However, banking is likely to be deeply impacted also.
Agentic commerce and AI search will alter the steps consumers take to reach a financial decision. Banks should map out these emerging journeys and identify where to join the conversation or support customer information gathering. A few scenarios and strategic responses include:
AI-recommended products: A consumer asks their AI assistant, “Find me a good travel credit card with no annual fee and great rewards.” The AI assistant comes back with a recommendation, perhaps “I suggest the XYZ Bank Travel Rewards Card because it has no annual fee and 3% cashback on travel.” If your bank is XYZ in this case, great — you won because your card’s info was accessible and compelling to the AI. If you’re not, how can you get into that consideration set?
Autonomous switching: Personal finance management (PFM) apps are increasingly agentic. Imagine an app that monitors a user’s accounts across banks and says, “You could earn $50 more in interest by moving your savings from bank A to bank B. Shall I move it for you?” If the user agrees, the agent uses open banking protocols to transfer funds or open a new account.
Voice or chat-based account opening: A user tells their conversational AI assistant, “Open a new checking account at bank Y.”
The retail customer journey is becoming less linear and more AI-influenced. Banks should keep their brand and products in that AI-influenced loop, either by feeding information AI needs or creating their own AI touchpoints for customers.
While the dynamic is different for B2B segments, ranging from small businesses to large corporations and institutional clients, the core concepts of AI-driven search and agentic processes still apply. Businesses often have more complex needs and continue to rely on relationship managers, but digital discovery and automation are increasingly important in commercial finance.
Business decision-makers often search for insights and guidance, not just product keywords. Take “How to manage cash flow in a seasonal business” or “Treasury management best practices 2025.” An AI assistant might be asked about this by a CFO or a finance manager. If your bank produces high-quality thought leadership (whitepapers, articles, research) on these topics, it not only builds credibility but can position the content to be referenced in AI-generated answers.
In commercial banking, the human touch will still matter. Agentic AI will likely handle more analysis and routine, while humans can focus on complex negotiations and trust-building. Marketers should position their bank as high-tech and high-touch. Emphasize that your bank uses AI to deliver fast, data-driven service while also professional advisors as needed. The goal is to reassure clients that AI isn’t making your service impersonal but instead making it more efficient so your people can spend a greater amount of time on what matters.
Here are practical changes banks can implement on their websites and mobile apps to support SEO, AEO, GEO and agentic commerce readiness.
Adopting AEO and GEO and preparing for agentic commerce is not without challenges. Banks should be mindful of these issues and plan steps to address them.
The marketing paradigm for banks is broadening from “search engine optimization” to “search everywhere optimization.” Concurrently, the notion of “customer” is expanding to include AI agents acting on the customer’s behalf. This demands a dual focus — staying discoverable to human customers and AI intermediaries alike.
In practical terms, banks in both B2C and B2B spheres should:
For banks, the shift to SEO, AEO, GEO and agentic commerce is both a challenge and an opening. It’s a chance for incumbents to modernize their approach and for forward-leaning institutions to capture early adopter customers. The cost of inaction, however, could be steep: reduced visibility, loss of customer engagement and being overshadowed by more tech-savvy rivals — or even tech companies encroaching on financial services.
{{item.text}}
{{item.text}}