Insights from America in Motion

Tariffs are today's catalyst for building resilience to future uncertainty and disruption

  • August 01, 2025

Global businesses are no longer facing isolated disruptions. Instead, they are operating with a constant churn of change. Tariffs may be the issue of the moment, but they are only one signal in a wider pattern. External forces are increasingly influencing internal decisions, and many organizations are still not equipped to respond effectively. These forces are increasingly driving companies to respond differently, quickly and effectively.

This is a moment for leadership to take a broader view and build resilience for the future.

Why strategy stalls before it starts

It’s difficult to plan and make decisions without clarity. And in the current tariff environment, there’s not much clarity and no single solution. The pressure is coming from all sides: policy shifts, supply disruptions, cost volatility and operational constraints. Many organizations are trying to respond but find themselves blocked by structural breakdowns that prevent fast, confident decision-making.

Key systems operate in isolation, making it difficult to build a clear, enterprise-wide view of cost, risk or exposure. Even when the right data exists somewhere in the organization, it’s rarely connected in a way that supports coordinated decisions.

Without aligned goals or shared accountability, each team solves for its own needs rather than a coordinated response. As a result, leaders get disjointed answers to enterprise-level questions and often struggle to move the organization forward.

Functions work in parallel but not together, leading to fragmented actions that miss the bigger picture. In a dynamic environment, this lack of integration slows down responses and increases the risk of missteps.

Heavy reliance on static models and backward-looking reports leaves companies behind as conditions shift in real time. These tools can describe what happened, but they can’t help decision-makers understand what to do next.

Tactical fixes solve individual problems but lack the scale or integration to support enterprise strategy. What’s missing is a repeatable, connected approach that helps leaders respond today and prepare for tomorrow.

The following challenges make it nearly impossible to respond strategically, even when the need for action is clear. They can slow down decisions, create conflicting priorities and leave companies exposed just when they need to move together.

Real-world tariff challenges: industry snapshots

Food & beverage

A food and beverage company relies heavily on apple juice concentrate, which is sourced from China and difficult to procure outside that region. With new tariffs in play, they explore alternatives in Mexico and Brazil, only to face capacity limitations and new cost concerns. Reformulating recipes introduces manufacturing and R&D complexity, which sourcing shifts raise tax and compliance implications tied to long-standing low-tax jurisdictions.

Apparel

A clothing brand manages a fully outsourced global production model, from stitching and assembly to tagging and packaging. With no owned operations, the company has limited visibility into subcontractors or material origins. Tariff exposure is difficult to trace and model and fragmentation across the value chain slows down the ability to respond with confidence.

Chemicals

A high-margin chemicals company sources most raw materials from China, exposing itself to concentrated risk. Current performance remains strong, but leadership lacks a diversification plan and clear execution path. The company’s profitability masks a deeper vulnerability. If trade conditions change quickly, they are not set up to respond without disruption.

Auto manufacturing 

A US-based automaker assembles vehicles domestically, but key parts move through Mexico multiple times. The most significant tariff exposure lies in tier 2 and 3 suppliers, where visibility is low. This multi-border movement creates cost layering and compliance challenges while upstream disruptions quietly drive pricing pressure downstream.

Planning across time horizons

Disruption resilience requires a coordinated set of actions mapped across time. Some decisions should happen immediately. Others require preparation, staging or long-term shifts in strategy and structure. 

Tariffs are a clear example of this. They demand quick tactical moves, like supplier negotiations or cost modeling. But they also raise questions that play out over months or years, including tax planning, operating model design and commercial positioning. The table below outlines how organizations can structure their short-, medium- and long-term responses to tariff-related challenges across customs, supply chain, tax and commercial strategy. This isn’t a linear roadmap. It’s a repeatable decision framework. The goal isn’t just to respond once, but to keep planning as conditions evolve.


America in motion America in motion

Questions to ask yourself to identify your current gaps

Responding to tariffs and other disruption takes more than data or instincts. It requires the ability to connect insights to coordinated action. You’re probably feeling the pressure to act but still lack the systems and structures to do so confidently. Our May Pulse Survey found that while many companies are cutting costs and renegotiating with suppliers in response to the tariff situation, fewer have built scenario planning and cross-functional capabilities that translate into strategy. The following questions can prompt deeper reflection about what’s missing, what’s misaligned and what might need to change.

Surface-level reporting or static dashboards are no longer enough. Forward-looking decisions require data that is layered, structured and continuously refreshed. If you can’t trust your data to support what-if planning, it may be time to re-evaluate the foundation.

Most organizations have the right data, but not in the right places or formats. If each function is still relying on its own spreadsheets or tools, decisions will remain disjointed. Look for opportunities to create a common model that allows functions to interpret the same signals together.   

Tariff and supply risk often live upstream, where visibility is lowest. If you’re only modeling known suppliers, you’re not seeing the full picture. Start mapping beyond tier 1 to identify vulnerabilities that could surface later when there’s less time to react.

A single change can affect tax, sourcing, pricing and logistics simultaneously. If your teams can’t see those interdependencies in one place, they’ll end up solving different versions of the same problem. Invest in ways to bring cross-functional planning into a shared decision environment.

The pandemic was an unexpected, far-reaching disruption and a rare opportunity to reimagine the future of your business. Yet many organizations focused on short-term stabilization then returned to familiar ways of working. Ask whether the root causes of past breakdowns have actually been addressed. If not, the same weaknesses will reappear under the next wave of pressure.

Insight is only valuable if it drives coordinated action. If reports are being generated but not acted on or if each team is acting independently, the organization is still operating reactively. Focus on embedding insights directly into planning and execution workflows.

Knowing what to do is not the same as being able to do it. If decisions stall due to unclear ownership, disconnected systems or execution gaps, the value of the insight is lost. Strengthen the connective tissue between analysis and action, especially across functions.

Start with the future, then work back

The questions companies are facing today about tariffs, costs, supply risk and structure aren’t just short-term challenges. They’re signals that it’s time to reimagine how the business makes decisions. That means letting go of reactive planning cycles and fragmented tools and instead asking: what should our decision environment look like in a world where uncertainty is constant?

Confident, resilient organizations start with a vision of their future state. One where cross-functional data is connected, scenario planning is continuous and teams are equipped to act together in real time. Then they work backward, identifying the systems, inputs and cultural shifts needed to get there. This isn’t just about navigating the current moment. It’s about building a capability that lasts and helps the organization move from disruption-prone to future-ready.

Model uncertainty in real time

Chart your next move

See how leaders are adapting to policy and supply shifts

Contact us

Chris Desmond

Chris Desmond

Principal, Customs and International Trade, PwC US

Michelle Horton

Michelle Horton

Principal, Health Industries Risk and Regulatory Leader, America in Motion leader, PwC US

Carla DeSantis

Carla DeSantis

CPG Leader, PwC US

Stephen D. Coyle

Stephen D. Coyle

Principal, PwC US

Follow us

Required fields are marked with an asterisk(*)

Your personal information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Statement. You can update your communication preferences at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in a PwC email or by submitting a request as outlined in our Privacy Statement.

Hide