The Bite-Size Business Brief: Agreeing the price - completion accounts or locked box?

Oct 06, 2022

Agreeing the price - completion accounts or locked box?

When selling a business and assessing what constitutes a “good deal” it’s often the case that cash is king. A seller can expect a buyer to drive down the valuation through various mechanisms and adjustments that may mean they are able to pay less than what is initially agreed as the headline price. Two of the most common methods for determining the purchase price in an M&A transaction is to use either completion accounts or a locked box structure. Each approach introduces different dynamics to a transaction and may present sellers with varying risks and benefits. 

The suitability of any price determination mechanism always requires careful consideration and will often vary from one transaction to another. The following table considers general trends and our experience of the related pros and cons of the two options.

 

Completion accounts 

Locked box 

Overview

  • The price is measured against an agreed metric of the target business (e.g. an agreed amount of working capital or net debt).
  • Completion accounts are prepared post-completion and are used to confirm if the target's financial position, as at the date of completion, is consistent with the value in the acquisition agreement.
  • The purchase price is adjusted up or down to align with the value reflected in the completion accounts.
  • An exact purchase price is agreed between the parties prior to completion - the “locked box date”.

  • This price is usually based on a recent set of pre-completion accounts (usually the most recent audited accounts).

  • The buyer is unable to adjust the price after the locked box date, unless they can prove that there has been “leakage” (i.e. the value of the target business has reduced because of a certain agreed leakage event such as a disposal of significant assets or the termination of a material contract etc).

Who does it generally favour?

Pro-Buyer: buyer receives comfort that the price they will pay reflects the actual value at the time of completion.

Pro-Seller: seller receives price certainty subject to their adherence with the agreed leakage provisions, which they can generally control or agree to be treated as permitted leakage.

Key potential seller advantages

  • Provides an accurate method for valuing a business.

  • May reduce the complexity of the buyer’s financial due diligence exercise, given that there is less pressure to agree the price prior to completion, which should reduce the time and effort burden placed on a seller and management to collate and provide diligence information.

  • The seller receives the benefit of any economic uplift within the business up to the date of completion.

  • Price certainty on behalf of the seller.

  • Avoids protracted negotiations with the buyer in respect of price adjustments, as occasionally experienced when using completion accounts.

  • Generally, a locked box approach may allow a smoother negotiation and so may reduce transaction costs.

Key potential seller disadvantages

  • Generally more complexity in negotiating the mechanism.

  • May increase the overall timing of the transaction, as the buyer will require time and professional support to review the completion accounts and implement any price adjustments.

  • Generally an increased risk of disputes arising, given the lack of price certainty and potential for adjusting the purchase price.

  • A buyer may require onerous leakage provisions and a seller will usually need to grant indemnities in favour of the buyer which may inhibit the seller in their ability to fully operate the business prior to completion. 

  • If the value of the business increases between the locked box date and completion, this will not be recognised in the purchase price (a notional percentage increase can be applied if there has been sizeable movement).

  • A buyer may wish to conduct a more intensive due diligence process, given they will not have an ability to price adjust.

PwC Legal Middle East

PwC Legal’s award-winning team of over 60 lawyers is ideally positioned within the Middle East market to be your M&A legal advisor. Alongside our Middle East hub in Dubai, we have lawyers based on the ground in Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Our Corporate practice has lawyers and legal professionals dedicated to M&A, Restructuring, Family Business, Company Services and Corporate Governance. This, in combination with PwC Legal’s global network of over 5,500 legal professionals in 100+ countries, makes PwC Legal one of the world’s largest legal networks by geographical coverage.

PwC Legal delivers legal services in an innovative and collaborative nature, unmatched by our competitors. Through working alongside our colleagues within the PwC business (including corporate finance and financial and tax due diligence teams), PwC Legal delivers a truly holistic, ‘one stop shop’, service for clients. The synergies and collaboration between our teams not only saves our clients costs, but also improves the quality and efficiency of our engagements by removing the need for multiple third party advisers.

Corporate M&A Dubai Team:

Amun Bashir

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 50 559 3634

Email

Gachini Macharia

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 50 725 5310

Email

Gemma Kotak

Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 54 793 3618

Email

Paul Kirk

Senior Associate, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 56 406 3410

Email

Raahil Mirchandani

Associate, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 54 995 4034

Email

Corporate M&A KSA Team:

Elie Mikhael

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+966 (0) 56 139 7935

Email

We unite expertise and tech so you can outthink, outpace and outperform
See how
Follow us