The Bite-Size Business Brief: post-sale restrictive covenants

Oct 13, 2022

Post-sale restrictive covenants

What are they and what restrictions should a seller accept?

During a sale process, a buyer will typically want to ensure that any seller or continuing shareholder is prevented from establishing a competitive business which could diminish the value and goodwill of its investment in the newly acquired business.

In M&A transactions it is common practice for the sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to include undertakings and covenants which restrict parties from carrying out certain activities following the completion of a sale. These are commonly referred to as restrictive covenants.

Common types of restrictive covenants

  • Non-competition: prohibits creating or participating in a competing venture.
  •  Non-solicitation/non-dealing: prohibits soliciting or canvassing clients or customers of the target business.
  •  Non-poaching: prohibits poaching employees.
  •  Reputation: prohibits using the same or a confusingly similar name used by the target business. 

Common law application

In the UAE (and wider Middle East region), it is common for SPAs to be governed by the law of a common law jurisdiction (such as the laws of England and Wales or the laws of the Dubai International Finance Centre or Abu Dhabi Global Market). Common law generally applies the doctrine of precedent and specifically the doctrine of restraint of trade in respect of disputes regarding restrictive covenants. A court or arbitral tribunal applying common law would ordinarily apply a “reasonableness” assessment to any dispute relating to restrictive covenants.

Drafting and negotiation

A buyer is expected to take a reasonable approach to drafting/reviewing non-compete provisions in order to avoid challenges relating to enforceability. Such restrictive covenants or undertakings provided by the seller should generally be no wider than is necessary to protect the buyer’s legitimate business interests and should be “reasonable”.

Restrictive covenants should be limited and tailored specifically to apply to the context of the transaction, including restricting such covenants to the relevant field of business or industry, an appropriate time period and a reasonable and relevant geographical scope. If, for example, supplier relationships in a particular country are key to the business, the restrictive covenants may be tailored to include non-solicitation of the existing or named suppliers in that country for a certain period of time that is otherwise reasonable and appropriate; or if in-house developed software is of material importance to the value of the business, restrictive covenants may be extended to restrict the seller from developing the same or similar software in respect of a competing business for a certain period of time.

Restrictions should generally be confined to territories in which the target business is operating and the clients/suppliers/employees who are engaged by the target business at the time of the transaction. That said, there is no one-size-fits-all approach and enforcement will be determined by the relevant court or tribunal on a case by case basis.

As such, a seller should carefully consider the ramifications of entering into restrictive covenants and whether it will be in a position to truly comply with the restrictions for the period of time stipulated and in the geographical scope covered. Relevant to this assessment will be whether the seller has any interest in any continuing business or third party which a seller may wish to expand or invest post completion. Carve outs from restrictions (including carving out other seller group entities if applicable) should be considered. Typical carve outs may include being permitted to hold a minor interest in a competing listed company or being able to advertise vacant positions and employing a target employee who has independently responded to an advertisement.

If a seller is an individual and agrees to stay on in the target business as an employee or director, a seller can expect their service/employment agreement will also include a set of separate post-termination restrictive covenants. Specific employment advice should always be sought when negotiating these. 

PwC Legal Middle East

PwC Legal’s award-winning team of over 60 lawyers is ideally positioned within the Middle East market to be your M&A legal advisor. Alongside our Middle East hub in Dubai, we have lawyers based on the ground in Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Our Corporate practice has lawyers and legal professionals dedicated to M&A, Restructuring, Family Business, Company Services and Corporate Governance. This, in combination with PwC Legal’s global network of over 5,500 legal professionals in 100+ countries, makes PwC Legal one of the world’s largest legal networks by geographical coverage.

PwC Legal delivers legal services in an innovative and collaborative nature, unmatched by our competitors. Through working alongside our colleagues within the PwC business (including corporate finance and financial and tax due diligence teams), PwC Legal delivers a truly holistic, ‘one stop shop’, service for clients. The synergies and collaboration between our teams not only saves our clients costs, but also improves the quality and efficiency of our engagements by removing the need for multiple third party advisers.

Corporate M&A Dubai Team:

Amun Bashir

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 50 559 3634

Email

Gachini Macharia

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 50 725 5310

Email

Gemma Kotak

Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 54 793 3618

Email

Paul Kirk

Senior Associate, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 56 406 3410

Email

Raahil Mirchandani

Associate, PwC Legal Middle East

+971 (0) 54 995 4034

Email

Corporate M&A KSA Team:

Elie Mikhael

Senior Manager, PwC Legal Middle East

+966 (0) 56 139 7935

Email

We unite expertise and tech so you can outthink, outpace and outperform
See how
Follow us