February 01, 2021
Issue 2021-03
The combination of rising home prices and the financial stress and uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic is resulting in more condominium purchasers reconsidering their acquisition. While some buyers always planned to assign their agreements of purchase and sale (APS) to a third party, many other buyers that originally intended to lease or reside in their condominium units are also assigning their APS. There are a number of reasons for this, one of which is a reduction in the demand for rental condominiums in many Canadian cities. As discussed in a recent Tax Court of Canada decision, Chen Sun v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 112, there are many Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) issues to consider when an APS is assigned to a third party, including whether:
The assignment of an APS will constitute a taxable supply, unless it qualifies for an exemption. This is because “real property” is defined to include an interest in real property, and the making of a supply of real property (other than an exempt supply) is deemed to be made in the course of a “commercial activity.” The sale of an interest in a residential complex by a person that is not a “builder” is generally exempt; however, the sale of an interest in a new home or condominium is generally subject to GST/HST when the assignor is a “builder.”
A “builder” is defined in a manner which can potentially include someone that is merely entering into an APS with a builder. For example, subject to a specific exclusion that only applies to individuals, someone that acquires an interest in a home before it is occupied (or a condominium before it is registered) can be a builder if their primary purpose was to either:
Individuals are excluded from being a builder if they did not acquire their interest in the course of a business or an adventure or concern in the nature of trade, which is determined by considering the following factors:
To the extent that the assignor is a “builder,” GST/HST will be payable on the value of consideration that is paid by the assignee and the assignor will be required to collect GST/HST unless the assignee is registered for GST/HST.
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers an amount paid by an assignee on account of the assignor’s deposit to be part of the consideration paid for the assignment of an APS, and is therefore subject to GST/HST if the assignor is a builder. Accordingly, unless the assignment is restructured to result in the builder refunding the deposit to the assignor and receiving a replacement deposit from the assignee, the assignee may pay double tax on the deposit. It is also important to note that the Tax Court of Canada’s decision in Casa Blanca Homes Ltd. v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 338 contradicts the CRA’s view. In Casa Blanca Homes Ltd., the Tax Court of Canada held that the amount paid to the assignor relating to the deposit constituted an exempt supply of a financial service and would therefore not be subject to GST/HST.
The assignment of an APS may also impact the assignee’s eligibility to claim the new housing rebate, as evidenced by the Tax Court of Canada’s recent decision in Chen Sun. The federal new housing rebate is equal to 36% of the federal component of GST/HST paid, up to a maximum of $6,300 (for homes valued at $350,000), with the rebate being gradually reduced and phased out when the value of the home reaches $450,000. For properties in Ontario, the provincial new housing rebate is equal to 75% of the provincial component of GST/HST paid, up to a maximum of $24,000 (for homes valued at $400,000 or higher).
For a purchaser to be eligible for the new housing rebate, the following conditions must be met:
When the purchaser qualifies for the new housing rebate, the builder is generally entitled to pay or credit the rebate amount to the purchaser pursuant to subsection 254(4) of the Excise Tax Act.
In situations where a third party is acquiring ownership of a home or condominium and they receive title directly from the builder, it does not necessarily mean that the APS has been assigned to the third party and that the builder has sold the condominium to the assignee. As argued by the Crown in Chen Sun, if the builder has not accepted the assignment, then the assignee may not be the person that is acquiring the condominium from the builder. Fortunately, in Chen Sun, the court ultimately held that the APS was in fact assigned on the basis that the builder, by its conduct, accepted the assignment and therefore the builder did sell the condominium directly to the assignee. Accordingly, the assignee was eligible to claim the new housing rebate (and the builder was entitled to credit the assignee with the rebate) because the assignee acquired the condominium from the builder and the other conditions to claim the rebate were satisfied.
As the builder and purchaser are jointly and severally liable for housing rebates that have been claimed in error, it is important for builders to make sure that purchasers qualify for the rebate before they pay or credit the purchaser with the rebate. The CRA heavily scrutinizes rebate claims and, to the extent each and every condition to claim the rebate is not satisfied, the CRA will deny the rebate claim. In situations where an APS has been assigned, builders should consider whether:
All parties to a transaction in which an APS is being assigned and a housing rebate is being claimed should consider the GST/HST implications of the assignment. Failure to structure these assignments in an appropriate manner can significantly increase GST/HST costs for the respective parties, including:
PwC can help structure these assignments in a tax-efficient manner.