
Playback of this video is not currently available
10 teams came to impress at the 2019 Trust Builders Challenge finals last Saturday.
After spending weeks crafting and perfecting their presentations, the teams were in high spirits, and kept the momentum going throughout the day.
Part of PwC Malaysia’s Building Trust programme, the Trust Builders Challenge engages students in solving trust crisis in business. It encourages them to develop a perspective on trust as our future leaders.
This year, students formed teams to come to the aid of a fictitious online store, who faced a cybersecurity breach in their systems with hackers gaining access to their payment gateway and customer data. The problem was magnified by the IT department’s failure to address the issue and the CEO’s denial of the breach. They were tasked with providing solutions to the problem and rebuilding trust with all stakeholders affected.
Each team were paired with two mentors, one from PwC and one from an industry. Similar to last year, mentoring allowed teams to broaden and refine their presentations through feedback and interaction with their mentors.
The teams tested the mettle of their strategies with a panel of judges, which included Rajeev Peshawaria, CEO of the Iclif Leadership and Governance Centre, Toh Yen Kee, Special Officer for the Ministry of Finance, and members of PwC Malaysia’s senior management team.
The judges were impressed by the teams’ ability to demonstrate clarity in understanding the problem, their innovative and actionable solutions, and strategic delivery of their key messages.
In summing up the judges’ feedback, Yen Kee shared, “We loved the diversity in the solutions we heard today. Each team put forth a recommendation that wasn’t presented by any other team. What’s important is to focus on solutions that target the root cause, and give you the biggest impact for the limited resources most businesses have on hand.”
An interview of this year’s Trust Builders Challenge Judges
Playback of this video is not currently available
An interview of this year’s Trust Builders Challenge Judges
Team AWZome with our Managing Partner Sridharan Nair
Indeed, the judges were in for a tough deliberation. Ultimately, Team AWZome from the University of Nottingham Malaysia clinched the top prize. Team CIA from University of Malaya came in second and Team Confianzaa from Taylor's University rounded up the top three.
Team KCs from Sunway College and Team Elite from Sunway University received ‘Special Mentions’ for third and fourth runners up respectively.
The judges also highlighted three best presenter finalists this year - Jivasuthen (Team Michaelians), Bryan Chua (Team Design 100) and Alvin Ng (Team AWZome) - with Bryan taking the 'Best Presenter' title.
The team were very articulate and confident, and impressed the judges with their ability to build the scene and identify the impact of the crisis to all stakeholders. They also showed good use of props to make their points.
Their solutions included monitoring the ‘dark web’ for leaks in customer information, stringent cybersecurity penetration testing, and setting the right tone from the top by having the CEO turn down their bonus for the year.
Team AWZome with our Markets Leader Nurul A'in Abdul Latif
“I was looking for ideas that were innovative, and that come from their heart, as opposed to a solution that may also be found on Google. Be different, and don’t be afraid to take risks. And the key thing is to have a solution that is actionable in a crisis. If it’s not actionable, it won’t solve the problem.”
“The thing that stood out from the participants this year was their interesting use of props, which was left field. Presentation skills were top notch - they engaged in good eye contact, and were very positive and demonstrated a lot of confidence. It was hard to decide between them. I don’t think we (the judges) would have done half as well if we were in their positions!”
“To be a good presenter, you need to present well and speak well in both the presentation and the Q&A section. This year, the best presenter was able to clarify and explain his solutions in great detail, and address questions thrown to him. It was apparent that the team had stress tested them, which convinced judges that he knew what he was talking about.”