Resolution Planning

The Resolution Planning initiative requires financial institutions to effectively prepare for the worst crises situations, such as liquidity or capital crises leading to Failing or Likely to Fail (FLTF) situations. The methodology has its roots in the fallout from the last global financial crisis of 2008.

Stability and trust are integral parts of local, regional and global financial systems. However, in today's increasingly interconnected world, failing financial institutions can threaten the stability of financial systems. Costly public bailouts of 'too-big-to-fail' banks during the 2008 financial crisis highlighted the need to address the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions. Resolution plan, or “living will” of financial institutions, helps regulators and banks ensure important areas are resolution-proof, should an idiosyncratic shock lead to insolvency.

To prevent future failing banks having negative impact on the financial system and the wider economy, the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the local National Resolution Authorities (NRAs) were set up. One of the key tasks of the SRB and the local NRAs (in the Czech Republic the Czech National Bank) is to draft resolution plans for the banks, with significant cooperation with the institutions themselves.

This entails the following planning steps (before resolution):

  • Determine the banks’ critical functions
  • Evaluate and set their preferred resolution strategy
  • Identify and address any impediments to its resolvability

  • Setting minimum requirement for eligible liabilities (MREL)

  • Prepare for their possible resolution

… and the following execution steps (during and after the resolution):

  • Implement early intervention measures
  • Evaluate and decide on the FLTF situation
  • Initiate resolution
  • Apply resolution tools
  • Coordinate the involvement of the relevant Supervisory and Resolution Authorities

The role of banks: Seven dimensions of resolvability

Depending on the resolution strategy for each bank, the institutions have to frame their own response in the form of resolution planning to satisfy the Resolution Authorities in their increasing expectations (Czech version). Banks are also required to follow several European Banking Authority (EBA) Guidelines and Regulatory Technical Standards, and are required to provide evidence of its preparedness for a potential resolution in the following seven dimensions:


Governance

… robust processes for:

  • preparation as well as implementation of the resolution strategy
  • timely and accurate provision of relevant information
  • effective oversight
  • efficient decision-making at the time of resolution

Loss absorption and recapitalisation capacity

… sufficient loss absorption and recapitalisation capacity to absorb losses in resolution:

  • to support the continued performance of critical functions during and after resolution
  • both at parent and subsidiary levels

Liquidity and funding in resolution

… processes and capabilities - during and after resolution - to:

  • estimate the liquidity and funding needs for the implementation of the resolution strategy
  • measure and report the liquidity situation
  • identify and mobilise available collateral that can be used to obtain funding

Operational continuity in resolution and access to financial market infrastructure

… adequate operational arrangements to ensure the continuity of services necessary for:

  • preserving critical functions and core business lines
  • maintaining access to FMIs and to payment, clearing, settlement and custody services

Information systems and data requirements

… adequate Management Information Systems to:

  • develop and maintain resolution plans
  • execute a fair, prudent and realistic valuation
  • effectively apply resolution actions

Separability and restructuring

… structure that supports the implementation of the resolution strategy:

  • define and assess the transfer perimeter
  • analyze legal, financial and operational aspects of separating parts of the bank’s assets or of the whole institution, based on the identified resolution strategy

Communication

… the ability to ensure timely, robust and consistent communication:

  • identify critical internal and external stakeholders
  • prepare an effective communication plan for the identified stakeholder groups
  • link the communication plan to the institution’s governance, recovery planning, and communication in their normal business activities

Since the process of a failing institution can be very quick and surprising, on top of integrating the resolution planning process into the above impacted areas, several concrete playbooks / handbooks are required from the institutions:

Governance setup

A detailed mapping of responsibilities of critical people within the institution with a clearly defined role during resolution.

Bail-in Playbook

Description of detailed processes for a timely and effective support for the NRA in write-down and/or conversion (WDC) of capital instruments and other bail-inable liabilities.

Sale-of-business Playbook or an Asset Separation Playbook

Description of a process in which the failing institution would be sold to a different bank in whole or in part (alternatively sold to a Bridge institution with the intention of eventual sale to a new owner).

Liquidity Plan and tools for a liquidity crisis

Estimation of liquidity needs in resolution for the implementation of the approved resolution strategy.

Business Continuity Plans

Amended to take into account the requirements for operational continuity and access to FMIs in resolution.

Valuation Handbook

Together with an effective Management Information System able to quickly hand-over to the NRA the required information.

Crisis Communication Plan / Playbook

Outlining the key stakeholders, communication channels and communication responsibilities during the crisis.

We can help from small support in individual resolvability dimensions to comprehensive resolution planning support covering all the phases from gap analysis to final regulatory submission.

Our approach

We support institutions in their understanding, management and deliveries towards their preparedness for resolution. We cover all aspects of the Resolution Planning process:

  • Revision and preparation of the initiative
  • Review of the current state and gap analysis, through
  • Development of the resolution planning activities in the required dimensions, and to
  • Support during the submission to the regulatory authorities

By helping the banks in their resolution planning, a collection of improvement opportunities and recommendations are formulated towards reaching regulatory compliance and leading market practice. The initiative delivers targeted projects designed to implement the recommendations. It usually maps the existing state of the institution’s resolution planning agenda, identifies gaps vis-à-vis the regulatory expectations, and proposes remediation steps.

 

Contact us

Rostislav Černý

Rostislav Černý

Risk Management & Modelling, PwC Czech Republic

Tel: +420 775 176 782

Peter Tuchyňa

Peter Tuchyňa

Financial Services Risk and Regulatory, PwC Czech Republic

Tel: +420 705 892 802

We unite expertise and tech so you can outthink, outpace and outperform
See how