The guidelines to the TP Rules provide examples of what should and what should not constitute a “materially altered arrangement”. In summary, the guidelines suggest a case-by-case analysis which must consider the substance of the arrangement by reference to the functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by each of the parties to the arrangement (not necessarily the form of the arrangement). Changes to the consideration, rights/ obligations or the duration of the arrangement would constitute a material alteration.
The application of the TP rules precedes the application of the Notional Interest Deduction (“NID”) Rules. This means that before determining the risk capital of an entity that falls within the scope of the TP Rules, consideration must be given to whether loans or other debt should bear interest in line with the TP Rules. Any tax attributes brought forward from previous years (e.g., unabsorbed losses or unabsorbed NID), in respect of arrangements that were outside scope, are not required to be restated.