It’s important to note that after the review, the PEI will classify taxpayers as compliant, non-compliant, or exempted.
The Australian experience is often used as a comparison, as both frameworks prioritise transparency, accountability, and robust control environments, which is reflected in the taxpayer’s responsibilities. The Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) “Justified Trust” methodology clearly indicates strong practices validated by independent testing, alongside areas requiring improvement, through a three-tier rating system. This approach signals that tax governance is a critical board-level responsibility, rather than a mere compliance obligation—a principle that is similarly applicable within our own regulatory environment.
Closer to home, while the classification methods differ, both frameworks prioritise transparency, accountability, and robust control environments—key pillars of strong tax governance.
Additionally, taxpayers are permitted to appoint registered tax agents to represent them or attend reviews alongside them. The roles and responsibilities of registered tax agents are clearly outlined in the framework.
Beyond understanding these roles and responsibilities, it’s essential for businesses to be familiar with the key timelines involved. The summary diagram below highlights these critical milestones—from the initial notification to the final conclusion of the review—providing a clear roadmap to navigate the compliance journey effectively.