Legislation on substance requirements for companies tax resident in Jersey

In November 2017, Jersey and Guernsey, in common with a number of other jurisdictions, were requested by the EU Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation (COCG) to give reassurances on the lack of a substance requirement for companies tax resident in their territories, and to discuss introducing additional accounting and tax reporting obligations and an appropriate notification regime for entities that give rise to risks and concerns.

The government of Jersey has now published draft legislation introducing the changes sought and intended to apply for companies with accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019.

The draft provides that a tax resident company carrying on any relevant activity must satisfy a new economic substance test.

Relevant activities are defined as any of the following businesses:

  • Banking
  • Insurance
  • Fund management
  • Finance and leasing
  • Headquarters 
  • Shipping
  • Holding company 
  • Intellectual property holding
  • Distribution and service centre

The definitions of these activities largely use existing regulatory definitions. Finance and leasing means the business of providing credit facilities of any kind for consideration, but does not include leases granting exclusive rights to occupy land. This recognises real estate income is not the target of these provisions given the prevalence of local withholding taxes. Holding companies are defined as holders of subsidiaries as defined in Jersey company law.

The economic substance test in relation to a relevant activity is met if:

  1. A tax resident company is directed and managed in Jersey by meetings of the Board of Directors in Jersey at an adequate frequency, with a quorum physically present and the minutes recording strategic decisions and the directors collectively having the necessary knowledge and expertise to discharge their duties.
  2. The tax resident company conducts core income generating activities from within Jersey. These are illustrated in the draft using descriptions from the OECD's BEPS Action 5 on harmful tax practices. These core income generating activities  may be conducted in Jersey by another entity on behalf the relevant company if the relevant company is able to monitor and control the carrying out of that activity.
  3. Having regard to the level of relevant activity carried on in Jersey there is an adequate level of physical assets in Jersey, adequate expenditure incurred in Jersey and an adequate number of employees physically present in Jersey, whether or not employed by the resident company or another entity.  

A company is not required to meet the economic substance test if it has no gross income in relation to a relevant activity carried on by it.

In the case of a high-risk IP company, defined as any company carrying on an intellectual property holding business (a) which did not create the intellectual property which it holds, acquired it from a connected person or in consideration for funding R&D elsewhere, and which licences to connected persons or (b) that does not carry on research and development, branding or distribution as part of its Jersey core-income generating activities, there is a rebuttable presumption that the economic substance test is failed.

In other cases, the Comptroller may conclude that the economic substance test has not been met. Where such a determination is made, and in the case of high risk IP companies, whether or not a determination is made, the Comptroller must exchange the information provided by the company, either on its tax return or as a result of enquiries, with the competent authority of the European Union member state in which resides a holding body, the ultimate holding body, and an ultimate beneficial owner (owning 25% or more of the share capital) of the resident company. If the resident company is incorporated outside Jersey, the provision of information is to the competent authority of the member state in which the resident company is incorporated.

There are also financial penalties if the Comptroller determines a failure to meet the economic substance test. In the first financial period up to £10,000, in the second period up to £100,000. After the first penalty, the Comptroller may provide the Minister for Treasury and Resources with a report on the company and the Minister may apply to the court for an order of winding up.  There is provision for appeal against penalty determinations.

Guernsey is expected to produce similar draft legislation shortly.

Companies tax resident in Jersey and Guernsey will need to consider the draft legislation and how it will apply in their circumstances, bearing in mind the intended application of the new rules from 1 January 2019. Guidance notes, given some statutory force by the draft legislation, are expected shortly.

Contact us

Justin Woodhouse

Justin Woodhouse

Tax Partner, PwC Channel Islands

Tel: +44 7700 838233

David Waldron

David Waldron

Tax Director, PwC Channel Islands

Tel: +44 7781 138617

Follow us