Six focus areas to help you ensure predictable and positive outcomes from your capital projects

Six focus areas to help you ensure predictable and positive outcomes from your capital projects

In this seven-part series of blogs, Daryl Walcroft discusses PwC’s “Project Excellence System” – beginning by providing an overview of the framework as whole, and then drilling down into each of its six capabilities in turn. With US capital projects poised to experience a renewed infusion of spending, Daryl says the framework can play a crucial role in keeping projects on track, and ensuring they deliver successful outcomes. 

If you could design your ideal capital project delivery approach, what characteristics would it have? Here are a few suggestions.

It would deliver the right projects on time and on budget. It would spend capital efficiently, maximizing ROI. It would involve a minimal number – and the smallest magnitude – of changes over its lifecycle. And it would use efficiency gains to progressively drive down project design, construction and management costs.

This is a great wish-list. But all too often, a wish-list is what it remains. Or worse, just wishful thinking.

Here’s a case in point. Recently, we were called in to help stabilize a multi-year, multi-billion dollar capital project that was in trouble. Project costs and estimated time to completion were rising by the week. There were real risks that an announcement of an overrun could erode shareholder confidence and negatively impact the stock price.

By the time we were called in, it was too late for us to influence the capital strategy and allocation decisions – those had already been made. But the big problem was how difficult it was to gauge where the project stood in terms of schedule and cost to completion. Management didn’t have information available to help them understand where the bottom was, let alone if it had been reached yet.

So our immediate priorities were to establish clear lines of communication and ascertain the facts. Our team hit the ground running, implementing robust project governance, controls, processes, analysis and reporting to give management the granular financial and operational insight they needed to make the right decisions and communicate openly with external stakeholders. In short, restoring trust and confidence was key.

The project – while late and over budget – was managed through to completion in a controlled and transparent way. But what created this situation in the first place? In fact, while each major capital project failure may look unique in itself, most projects that run into problems do so for a small handful of reasons that are remarkably consistent and well understood by many in the industry. Issues like poor cost estimating and cost forecasting, a lack of clear scope definition, inexperience in managing large construction projects, unclear contract terms, and a failure to implement appropriate integrated governance, reporting and technology are often the root cause of troubled projects.

Similarly, the factors that help ensure project success ­– from inception to completion ­– are also remarkably consistent. In fact, our global wealth of experience in capital projects over decades has enabled us to boil the success factors for any major capital project down to a set of six key capabilities.

They’re shown in the schematic below. And while each capability is distinct from the others and can be tackled separately, it’s vital to appreciate that they’re all interconnected and interdependent – and that they must work together in a holistic and coordinated way to deliver both project and portfolio success.

In combination, these six capabilities form a framework we refer to as a Project Excellence System, which we use to guide projects to their optimal end state – benefiting from the kinds of positive characteristics that I outlined at the start of this blog. And even if a project is under way and has already run into trouble, applying the principles of a Project Excellence System helps us identify the areas where rapid action will yield the biggest and fastest benefits to get it back on track.

In the next seven blogs in this series on capital projects, I’ll take a look at each of the six Project Excellence System capabilities, before tying everything together in a closing summary blog.

Here’s a closing thought: Failed projects get into the news all the time, while the successful ones are never mentioned. I want to help you keep your project out of the headlines. Watch this space.

To learn more about successful capital project delivery and the PwC “Project Excellence System”, please visit “Keys to successful capital projects” and download our Insights on this topic.

For additional information and analysis on the evolving US infrastructure market and what we can do for you, please visit US Capital Projects & Infrastructure on PwC.com.

Daryl Walcroft is Principal and US Leader of PwC’s Capital Projects and Infrastructure practice.

Brett Bisaga, P.E.

Trusted advisor helping maximize the value of capital investments and unlocking the benefits of large scale technology implementations

7y

Great read and summary - keeping or client's projects out of the headlines!

Nakul Maheshwari, MRICS, MCIPS, M.B.A

Director, Procurement and Commercial (Qiddiya Giga project Vision 2030, Riyadh KSA)

7y

Nice write up. My experience in Field Project Controls was on both, successful and failed projects. In the execution phase, setting up the appropriate work breakdown structure (code of accounts) that defines the cost and scope baseline before mobilising to the field is just so important for monitoring, controlling, reporting, cost forecasting and close out (including developing the historical cost report). Your next project bid is only as good as the quality of tracking & reporting of the reference projects. A forward looking change control/ risk management program goes such a long way too and this is where a project controls team that understands both, the financials and the technical EPC will play a critical role. Many times projects just tend to find themselves truing up costs with no possibility of mitigating the risks, as you mentioned in your example of being called in to stabilise a project.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics