October 2020
For Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) purposes, the Ohio Supreme Court recently held that revenue received by a taxpayer for selling alarm-services contracts was sourced outside of Ohio because its customer received the benefit of such intangible contract rights at the location outside Ohio where the customer received payments and performed monitoring services.
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in Defender may come as a surprise to many CAT taxpayers. The Ohio Department of Taxation frequently has argued that a ‘look through’ approach should be used on certain transactions such as services. Although the facts in this case are unique, CAT taxpayers may want to revisit receipts situsing methodologies to analyze if they are consistent with the holding in Defender.