Financial expert witness Daubert challenge study
Daubert criteria are applicable to all types of expert testimony in federal cases, including financial expert witness testimony.
In 1993, the US Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. addressed the admissibility of expert scientific testimony in federal trials, affirming a gate-keeping role for judges in determining the reliability and relevance of the testimony. In 1999, the Supreme Court’s decision in Kumho
Tire Co. v. Carmichael clarified that the Daubert criteria were applicable to all types of expert testimony, not merely testimony relating to science.
PwC’s research continues to show that Kumho
’s broadening of Daubert
’s application has led to a steady increase in the number of challenges to all expert witnesses.
Daubert Challenges to Financial Experts: An 11-year study of trends and outcomes
This study analyzes post-Kumho Tire (2000-2010) challenges to financial expert witnesses under the Daubert standards. We identify observable trends in the frequency and outcome of these challenges based on written opinions in federal and state courts. The study examines the challenges to provide insight into the reasons experts were challenged and excluded and to delve more analytically into the causes of exclusions based on the qualifications of the experts and the relevance and reliability of the expert testimony. The study also summarizes some of the specific financial, statistical, economic, and valuation methods that courts have found inadmissible.
2009 Daubert study
2009 marked the 10th anniversary of the Kumho Tire decision. This crisis management study analyzes post-Kumho Tire (2000-2009) challenges to financial expert witnesses under the Daubert standard and looks at observable trends in the frequency and outcome of these challenges based on written opinions in federal and state courts.
2007 Daubert study
The 2007 Daubert study identifies characteristics of some of the most typical targets of challenges, factors influencing challenge success rates, and unusual/untested analytical methods that courts have found inadmissible.
2006 Daubert study
2006 marked the seventh anniversary of the Kumho
Tire decision. This study analyzes post–Kumho
Tire (2000–2006) challenges to financial expert witnesses under the Daubert standards, based on observable trends in the frequency and outcome of those challenges in federal and state courts.