The SEC Division of Corporation Finance's filing review process is a key function utilized by the SEC staff to monitor the critical accounting and disclosure decisions applied by registrants. Our analysis of SEC comment letters identifies the frequency of topical areas addressed by the SEC staff and how their focus areas changed over time. In addition to providing our insights on the nature of the SEC staff comments, we provide sample text from the SEC staff’s comments and links to where you can learn more about the accounting and disclosure requirements addressed in each topical area.
Click on the trends to learn more.
(7/1/2019 – 6/30/2020)*
|Relative change in number of letters compared to the Prior Period*|
|4||Management's discussion and analysis
|5||Inventory and cost of sales||Up|
|7||Fair value measurement||Down|
|9||Goodwill and other intangibles||Flat|
|10||Debt, quasi-debt, warrants and equity||Flat|
*This analysis was performed based on topical areas assigned by research firm Audit Analytics for comment letters publicly issued in the 12 months ended June 30, 2020 ("Current Period") and the 12 months ended June 30, 2019 ("Prior Period") in relation to Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filings. Total comment letters evaluated during the Current Period and Prior Period were approximately 150 and 200, respectively.
The relative number of comment letters has increased.
The relative number of comment letters has decreased.
The relative number of comment letters has not changed significantly.
Non-GAAP financial measures result in frequent comments regarding compliance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and the related compliance and disclosure interpretations, sometimes resulting in requests to remove or substantially modify non-GAAP metrics. Focus areas have included:
Presentation with equal or greater prominence of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure;
Reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure;
Appropriateness of adjustments to eliminate or smooth items identified as non-recurring, infrequent or unusual;
Use of individually tailored accounting principles; and
Disclosure of why management believes the non-GAAP presentation provides useful information to investors regarding the financial condition or results of operations of the registrant.
You disclose non-GAAP measures without presenting the comparable GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence. Please ensure any discussion regarding non-GAAP measures is preceded by an equal or more prominent discussion of the comparable GAAP measure.
Please include a reconciliation of core earnings that begins with the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Your revised reconciliation should provide disaggregated disclosure of all the adjustments necessary to arrive at core earnings from the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Your current disclosure discusses management’s use, but not how the presentation of the measure is useful to investors. Please revise your disclosure to include a discussion of investor’s use of these measures. Excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets may result in non-GAAP measures that are based on individually tailored accounting principles. Please tell us how you considered Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP C&DIs and why you believe these measures are useful to investors.
ASC 606, Revenue from contracts with customers, requires more quantitative and qualitative disclosure than prior guidance. The following areas have been addressed in the SEC staff's comments:
Performance obligations – the nature of performance obligations, why goods or services are distinct, and disclosure of remaining performance obligations. Also, comments related to information provided in other parts of the filing that appear inconsistent with the number of performance obligations in a contract.
Variable consideration – the determination of the transaction price and how a company estimates variable consideration.
Recognizing revenue – the timing of when control transfers, the method of recognizing revenue over time, and accounting for licensing arrangements.
Gross versus net presentation – judgments related to gross versus net presentation of revenue, including an assessment of whether the company controls the good or service being provided to the end customer.
Disaggregated revenue – disaggregation disclosures that appear inconsistent with information provided in other parts of the filing or in other forums, such as investor presentations.
We note from your disclosure initial nonrefundable pre-opening service fees, including site selection and evaluation, store development and design and operational training, are recognized upon completion of service. Please clarify your revenue recognition policy to specify the performance obligations included in contracts for licensed store arrangements. Your revised disclosure should indicate the goods or services promised in your licensing arrangements that are distinct and those that are combined to form a bundled performance obligation. Further, please disclose why you believe it is appropriate to recognize pre-opening services upon completion of service. As part of your revised disclosure, please discuss the significant judgments made by management in evaluating the timing of satisfaction of the related performance obligations and when a customer obtains control of the promised good or service in accordance with ASC 606-10-50-17 and 19.
We note that you provide some of your customers incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations. Please tell us if you consider the volume-based rebates as variable consideration and, if so, which method you used to estimate the amount of variable consideration (projected future shipments) pursuant to ASC 606-10-32-8. Revise to disclose this method in accordance with ASC 606-10-50-20(a).
We note revenue is generated and your customer receives a benefit as the freight progresses toward delivery locations. In this regard, please explain why recognition of revenue at a point in time (i.e. upon completion of delivery to the receiver's location) rather than over time is appropriate. As part of your response, please tell us your consideration of the guidance outlined in ASC 606-10-25-27 and ASC 606-10-55-5 and 6 in determining your accounting treatment.
Please provide us with your analysis regarding how you determined you had one performance obligation in your events and public relations arrangements. In addition, tell us how you determined you were acting as the principal in these arrangements. Reference ASC 606-10-25-19 through 22 and ASC 606-10-55-36 through 40.
It appears from your disclosures distribution and services revenues are recognized over time and at a point in time. Please tell us your consideration of ASC 606-10-55-91(f) in presenting disaggregated revenue on this basis.
SEC staff frequently question how registrants have identified operating segments and aggregated them into reportable segments, often due to events reported by companies in press releases or Form 8-K disclosures. SEC staff may expect to see changes in segments when the company has disclosed significant acquisitions or dispositions, changes in organizational structure, or changes in key personnel. To resolve segment questions, the SEC staff may request a copy of the reporting package utilized by the chief operating decision maker, or other documents, to evaluate its consistency with management’s reporting conclusions.
The lack of entity-wide information required to be disclosed under ASC 280 has also been highlighted by the SEC staff, Specifically, the SEC staff has focused on the required disclosures of:
Revenues from external customers for each group of similar products and services; and
Geographic disclosures of revenues from external customers and long-lived assets attributable to the public entity’s country of domicile and individual foreign countries that are material.
Given the disclosures about your core products as well as the impact on your gross margin driven by shifts in product mix, please expand your disclosure to include revenue for each group of similar products to comply with FASB ASC 280-10-50-40.
Please tell us in detail how you determined all of your operating segments or brands are properly aggregated into one reportable segment. Please be sure to address each of the aggregation criteria in ASC 280-10-50-11.
Please revise future filings to present separately revenues from external customers attributed to your country of domicile. Also, when material, separately disclose the revenues from external customers attributed to an individual foreign country. Refer to ASC 280-10-50-41(a).
The SEC staff’s comments on management’s discussion and analysis have emphasized the requirements in Item 303 of Regulation S-K and the related disclosure objectives, including a focus on:
The discussion and analysis of results of operations, including the description and quantification of unusual or infrequent events or any significant economic changes;
Metrics used by management in assessing performance, including how they are calculated and period over period comparisons;
Critical accounting estimates, including the judgments made in the application of significant accounting policies, and the likelihood of materially different reported results if different assumptions or conditions were to prevail; and
Liquidity and capital resources, including clear discussion of drivers of cash flows and the trends and uncertainties related to meeting known or reasonably likely future cash requirements.
If two or more factors contribute to material changes in revenue, please provide disclosure demonstrating the relative magnitude of each factor, such as the percentage or dollar increase in revenue due to onboarding of new customers versus usage from existing customers. In this regard, it appears from your most recent earnings releases that such information is readily available. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(iii) 303(a)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K and Section III.D of SEC Release No. 33-6835.
Where a material change in a line item is attributed to two or more factors, including any offsetting factors, the contribution of each identified factor should be described in quantified terms, if reasonably practicable. Please revise your disclosures in future filings accordingly. Similar revisions should be considered throughout your results of operations disclosures, such as in your discussion of the change in research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(ii) of Regulation S-K and Section III.D of SEC Release No. 33-6835.
We note your disclosure and quantification of capacity utilization. Please revise to describe how this measure is calculated and expand the discussion to include the underlying reasons for any significant fluctuations in the measure from period-to-period. Refer to Item 303(a)(3) of Regulation S-K.
Please provide information for investors to assess the probability of future goodwill impairment charges. For example, please disclose whether your reporting unit is at risk of failing step one of the quantitative impairment test or that the fair value of this reporting unit is substantially in excess of carrying value and is not at risk of failing step one. If the reporting unit is at risk of failing step one, you should disclose:
The percentage by which fair value exceeded carrying value at the date of the most recent step one test;
The amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit;
A detailed description of the methods and key assumptions used and how the key assumptions were determined;
A discussion of the degree of uncertainty associated with the assumptions; and
A description of potential events and/or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the key assumptions.
Please describe for us the actuarial methods you utilize to estimate your reserve, including significant assumptions and changes therein and why you believe the methods and assumptions provide a reasonable estimate.
As it relates to your analysis of cash provided by operating activities, please quantify all variance factors cited pursuant to section 501.04 of staff's Codification of Financial Reporting so that investors may readily understand the magnitude of each. Also, please note citing factors such as operating results and changes in balance sheet items may not provide a sufficient basis to understand how operating cash between comparative periods was affected and varied. In this regard, supplement your analysis with the material drivers underlying the factors cited, as appropriate. Refer to section IV.B.1 of Release No. 33-8350 for guidance.
The SEC staff comments for inventory focused on disclosing the basis of accounting for inventory.
For cost of sales, the SEC staff focused on the components of cost of sales, ensuring non-cash items, like depreciation, were allocated to cost of sales, and questioning the calculation of gross margin when it was not.
The SEC staff has focused on the areas in the implementation of ASC 842, Leases, requiring significant judgment. Specifically, comments have requested more information on:
The accounting for variable lease payments, including the basis of measuring these payments if variable payments are dependent on an index or a rate;
The determination of the weighted-average discount rate used to discount leases, including how the rate was determined or calculated for each class of lease; and
The accounting for material lease agreements with significant estimated construction costs associated with the lease.
In addition to the above areas of judgment, the SEC staff has also provided comments regarding omitted ASC 840 disclosures. Under ASC 842, companies are required to continue to provide ASC 840 disclosures for all periods that are reported in accordance with ASC 840, or otherwise explain why these disclosures are not necessary.
With the changes to the financial statements as a result of the adoption of ASC 842, some registrants have included lease-related adjustment in their non-GAAP measures. The SEC staff has asked companies whether the changes to their non-GAAP measures are appropriate given the staff’s guidance over such measures.
Please tell us and revise to disclose how you determined your weighted average discount rate on operating leases. See ASC 842-20-50-3(c)(3).
We note your disclosure that you have certain lease agreements structured with a fixed base rent adjusted periodically for inflation or changes in fair market value of the underlying real estate. Please provide us with additional details regarding the terms of the rent adjustments including the basis for determining the adjustments. Please also tell us how you are accounting for leases structured with these adjustments both at the commencement of the lease and subsequently. Specifically address whether any of these lease agreements include variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate.
In future filings, please provide the required ASC 840 disclosures for all periods that continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 840 or explain why such disclosures are not required. Reference is made to ASC 842-10-65-1(jj).
We note you include adjustments in arriving at net operating profit after taxes that appear to remove your operating lease rent expense under GAAP and replace it with estimated depreciation and include lease adjustments in arriving at average invested capital. Please tell us your basis for including each of these adjustments, how you determined the amount of these adjustments, how the adoption of ASC 842 was considered for continuing to present these adjustments and how your presentation complies with the guidance in Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.
Fair value measurements often require the application of significant judgment. The SEC staff has focused on the quality of disclosure around those significant judgments and estimates, frequently commenting on:
The valuation techniques and key inputs used to determine the fair value for each significant class of asset or liability, whether determined by management or a third party (e.g., independent pricing service).
The quantitative information provided for significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements, including the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in those significant unobservable inputs.
You indicate the securities included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued utilizing inputs obtained from an independent pricing service. Please tell us what consideration was given to disclosing a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements. In addition, tell us what consideration you gave to separately disclosing the valuation techniques and inputs for each class of assets. We refer you to ASC 820-10-50-2 and ASC 820-10-50-2(bbb).
Please disclose quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in developing the fair value of your Level 3 assets and liabilities. Also, tell us what consideration was given to providing a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs. Please refer to ASC 820-10-50-2(bbb) and (g).
Please tell us how you complied with the non-recurring fair value measurement disclosures related to the impairment charge, as required by ASC 820-10-50-2(a). Also refer to the example of these disclosures at ASC 820-10-55-100.
The accounting for business combinations and the related disclosures are a consistent area of focus for the SEC staff, with frequent comments related to:
Purchase price allocations, including questions about how fair value was determined and the key assumptions used;
Why the registrant omitted the pro forma financial information or other disclosures required by ASC 805; and
Compliance with the Regulation S-X Article 11 pro forma financial information requirements for significant business combinations disclosed on Form 8-K and in certain registration statements.
Please provide more detail regarding the royalty rate for the subject trade name and respective required rates of return used in the relief from royalty calculation. In addition to quantifying the inputs, please tell us how these inputs were determined, if a range of inputs were considered, and the magnitude of the impact on the trade name value if other inputs within the range, if any, had been used.
Please disclose a qualitative description of the factors that make up the goodwill recognized in the transaction in accordance with ASC 805-30-50-1(a).
We note your business combinations during the year were material in the aggregate to total assets for the current and prior year. Please disclose the following pursuant to ASC 805-10-50- 3 or tell us why you believe you are not required to disclose this information:
The amount of acquisition-related costs, the amount recognized as an expense, and the line item or items in the income statement in which those expenses are recognized;
The amounts of revenue and earnings of the acquiree since the acquisition date included in the consolidated income statement for the reporting period; and
The revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combinations that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period (supplemental pro forma information).
Please tell us how you considered the requirements for pro forma financial information pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation S-X for the sale of your Facilities described in Item 2.01 of Form 8-K.
The SEC staff has focused on the quality of the disclosure around significant judgments and estimates associated with goodwill and intangible assets, including impairment assessments, frequently commenting on:
The identification of reporting units, including factors considered when multiple components have been combined into a single reporting unit due to economic similarities;
At risk reporting units, including information about the amount of goodwill and headroom at the reporting unit, discussion of the key assumptions used to determine the reporting unit’s fair value and their associated degrees of uncertainty, and a description of potential events or changes in circumstances that could negatively affect the key assumptions;
Triggering events that may indicate that an interim impairment assessment is necessary; and
The timing of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges.
We note your statement that your reporting units with goodwill are equivalent to your operating segments. Please tell us your operating segments and if your operating segments changed during the year. If you have aggregated any of your operating segments when determining your reportable segments, please revise the segment footnote in your financial statements to disclose that operating segments have been aggregated. See ASC 280-10-50-21(a).
Please tell us how you considered the qualitative factors outlined in ASC 350-20-35-3C when performing your goodwill impairment analysis and clarify whether you performed a qualitative or quantitative assessment, or both. Also, tell us whether any of your reporting units are at risk of failing a quantitative analysis and if true, revise your critical accounting policies to disclose:
The percentage by which fair value exceeded carrying value as of the date of the most recent test;
The amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit;
A discussion of the degree of uncertainty, which includes specifics to the extent possible, associated with key assumptions used in your analysis; and
A description of potential events and/or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the key assumptions.
If you have determined that estimated fair values substantially exceed the carrying values of your reporting units, please disclose such determination. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(ii) of Regulation S-K and Section V of SEC Release 33-8350.
We note your disclosure in your Form 10-K that as of the end of your fiscal year, the fair value of your goodwill exceeded the carrying value by a minimal amount. Your stock price has continued to decline and you recognized operating cash flow losses and operating losses during the first quarter. Additionally, we note significant decreases in total revenues for the first quarter of the current year compared to the prior year. Tell us how you considered whether these trends were considered to be a triggering event for an additional goodwill impairment analysis. Please refer to ASC 350-20-35-30.
Debt, quasi-debt, warrants, and equity securities continue to be sources of restatements and revisions due to errors in the application of the relevant guidance. The accounting for such items often includes critical accounting estimates that require significant judgment. The SEC staff has focused on the transparency and quality of the disclosures around these judgments and estimates, frequently requesting:
Consumer Markets Assurance Leader, PwC US
Partner, National Professional Services Group, PwC US