Your purpose, your stakeholders: What it means for reporting

Start adding items to your reading lists:
Save this item to:
This item has been saved to your reading list.

Point of view , PwC US Sep 12, 2019

Serving society well and creating value for shareholders needn’t be mutually exclusive. Businesses should view the Business Roundtable's position as an evolution, not a revolution, because in today’s world social good and profitability are increasingly intertwined. In this era, there are a variety of risk factors that directly impact shareholder value and are not captured by traditional financial reporting. Managements, boards, and their investors should engage in the debate as to what is important for each company and define how success will be measured and reported. Purpose-led reporting has as much value to the profit-driven investor as it does to the ideology-guided activist, and companies are now grappling with how to create consistent, rigorous, and independently verified reporting that allows their commitment to these ideals to be accurately assessed. 

A company creates value among a broad group of stakeholders, including debt and equity investors, employees, customers, and suppliers, all while managing its broader obligations in society. How to balance sometimes conflicting needs of different stakeholders is a current hot topic among business leaders. Achieving this balance will require management, the board, and investors to work together to determine a company’s purpose and how to measure success.

Defining and communicating purpose has long been a focus of some institutional investors, but recently, an association of America’s leading CEOs got on board. The Business Roundtable (BRT) reignited considerable public discussion by overturning its 30-year stance that corporations exist primarily for the benefit of shareholders. The BRT pledged support for an expanded view of value that considers the interests of all stakeholders. In other words, the purpose of a corporation should be to invest in employees, protect the environment, deal fairly and ethically with suppliers, and support their communities, in addition to generating long-term value for shareholders.

Although many embrace a more expansive approach—a movement known as “stakeholder capitalism”—others continue to believe in shareholder primacy. Regardless of where you stand, one thing is certain: there are heightened expectations on each company to define its purpose, balance the needs of all of its stakeholders, and decide how it will measure and communicate success.

What “purpose-led” information is meaningful and measurable? As companies expand stakeholder reporting, the information should be on brand, consistent, commonly understood, and rigorous enough to support accountability. Undefined or misaligned measures may divert attention and challenge a reputation for credibility. Independent assurance would also provide confidence and trust in the information reported.

Community, Customers, Employees, Shareholders, Suppliers, Others - How should companies balance?

Business is about how customers, suppliers, employees, financiers (stockholders, bondholders, banks, and so on), communities, and managers interact and create value. To understand a business is to know how these relationships work.

Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success By R. Edward Freeman and Jeffrey S. Harrison

Steps on defining and reporting on your company's purpose

As a company considers its purpose, management’s role will be to define what is important and the best way to measure progress and success. This should include development of company-specific policies that facilitate transparency and accountability. The board should understand how the company clearly defines and communicates its purpose, including how it will consistently measure the value it delivers to stakeholders.

While company size and industry will inform your approach, these steps can get you started:

Lead with purpose: Now that you knowwhat is important tostakeholders, define yourpurpose, set related goals,and lead accordingly.Differing aspirationsamong stakeholders maymake it difficult to gainacceptance on a set ofmeasures. Be intentionalwith achievable goals. Live the purpose: Incentivize employees through theirparticipation in setting the company’sgoals and by connecting aspects ofcompensation to achieving them. Re-evaluate: Changes in the social, economic, orpolitical environments can lead to changesin stakeholder views. Periodically assesswhether the purpose-led metrics continueto resonate with stakeholders. 1 2 3 4 5 Develop and report purpose-ledmetrics: Develop consistent and controlled policies forquantifying and reporting purpose-led metrics. Align metrics reported externally with those usedby management in running the business. Organize metrics in a systematic way. Considerthe use of technology to make the informationinteractive and engaging. Offer comparison figures to demonstrateconsistency. Determine the appropriate format and howfrequently to report. Implement controls over the preparation andreporting of purpose-led metrics with the samerigor as controls over traditional financial reporting. Provide context - the most relevant metricsconsider the entity’s industry and markets. Take stock of your stakeholders: Identify each stakeholder group, includingemployees, and determine which aspects ofyour business are most important to each.

Ensuring reliability and consistency in stakeholder reporting

Financial statement reporting is a relatively mature discipline, with established standards and audit requirements. As such, users of financial statements are accustomed to a level of reliability, consistency, and comparability.

As companies refine their purpose beyond building shareholder value, reporting purpose-led information will differentiate a company and start to provide additional credibility and substance. But is reporting enough on its own? Assurance on a company’s efforts may be necessary to gain common understanding and acceptance of the information provided, and therefore, reliance on it.

Key questions to consider include:

  • Will consumers of the purpose-led information be confident in its accuracy without independent assurance?
  • Is there reliable information available to support the company’s assertions?
  • Does the company have a consistent policy on measurement and presentation of the measures with adequate governance?
  • Has management implemented appropriate processes and controls to support the reliability of the information reported?
  • Is there an accepted format for communication of the information?

Independent assurance is available now to help establish a common understanding of new value measures and spur wider adoption and acceptance of their use.

In addition, in the longer term, a formal reporting framework could replace ad hoc disclosures and enable greater comparability from one company to another and one industry to another. A framework would drive a measure of diligence, rigor, and consistency in how purpose-led information is captured, measured, and reported.

Imagine if you had regular financial statements for a company’s impact on the environment, for its labor standards, audited by external sources—and not being truthful had the same penalties

Neil Malhotra a professor atStanford’s Graduate School ofBusiness, Director of the school’sCenter for Social Innovation

What level of assurance makes sense?

Management should consider both the expectations of stakeholders and the nature of its own reporting to determine the appropriate level of assurance. Existing standards can cover a wide variety of subject matters, and offer three different types of reporting: examination, review, or agreed-upon procedures. There are key differences in the scope of procedures performed and the level of assurance provided. For example, an examination provides the highest level of assurance, similar to a financial statement audit. Conversely, an agreed-upon procedures report is issued by an independent third party on procedures determined by management and the report users.

Level of assurance: Agreed-upon procedures > Review > Examination

Questions and answers

1. For those who believe in shareholder primacy, does purpose-led reporting still matter?

Yes. The two are not mutually exclusive. Supporters of shareholder primacy focus on shareholder return; however, even in this context, factors such as employee satisfaction matter because satisfied employees generate shareholder value.

There are a variety of risk factors that affect shareholder value. They include poor management of resources, lack of employee engagement, inadequate cybersecurity controls, and threats to brand loyalty, as well as other environmental, social, and governance considerations. These types of risks, and the company’s performance against them, are not captured by traditional financial reporting. Purpose-led metrics aid investors focused on return with better visibility into all components of a company’s value proposition.

View more

2. How can the board provide oversight over purpose-led reporting?

A company’s board of directors plays a critical role in defining its purpose. Key tenets of board oversight have a natural overlap with management’s responsibilities regarding the execution of a defined purpose: establishing the tone at the top; ensuring that internal controls are in place and operating effectively; and promoting accurate, high quality, and timely disclosure of material information to the public. In this paradigm, the board is well-positioned to provide oversight over management’s purpose-led reporting.

View more

3. A framework will take time - what should I do now?

Purpose-led reporting can begin in the near term without further action from standard setters or regulators. A company could start by developing its own structured policy for reporting, focused on the factors and measurements important to its stakeholders. Measurements could range from same store sales to reliance on natural resources, employee turnover to information about the supply chain. While purpose-led reporting will typically include some amount of judgment, a robust policy would enhance the quality and consistency of judgments and enable independent assurance.

View more

Consumers and employees alike are demanding that businesses and brands do more for society. People now more than ever want companies to do the right thing and be transparent and accountable for their business practices.

Tim RyanPwC US Chairmanand Senior Partner

In summary

A company that balances the needs of all stakeholders can drive shareholder value while playing a broader role in society. Managements, boards, and their investors should engage in the debate as to what is important for each company. Further, an important next step will be to define how success will be measured and reported. Purpose-led information beyond the financial statements will support transparency and accountability to a broad stakeholder group. Usefulness of this information can be enhanced by subjecting company-specific policies and measurements to independent assurance, and later, a common regulatory framework

To have a deeper discussion on purpose-led reporting and how we can help, please contact:

Wes Bricker

Vice Chair - Assurance Leader, PwC US


Todd Bialick

Digital Assurance and Transparency Leader, PwC US


Heather Horn

US Strategic Thought Leader, National Professional Services Group, PwC US


Contact us

Heather Horn

Heather Horn

US Strategic Thought Leader, National Professional Services Group, PwC US

Follow us