In this letter, while we agree that the valuation of derivatives is a complex area and that information aimed at improving the general understanding of complex valuation concepts is beneficial, we have laid out three fundamental concerns with the document that we believe the board should address before proceeding with its issuance.
First, it is not clear what valuation standard this document is interpreting. Without that clarity, it is difficult for a reader to understand the conceptual framework that underpins this document, and may interfere with the stated goal of reducing diversity. We believe that the board should be more disciplined in its use of Technical Information Paper (TIPs), and be sure to provide clear linkage to a related valuation conceptual standard.
Second, the TIP states that the issue applies not only to financial institutions, but to corporate entities as well. It is not clear to us that the views of those corporate entities have been fully considered in the document, and we suggest that the Board specifically solicit and incorporate those views prior to release.
Finally, we do not believe a TIP should dictate or prescribe what model or technique is appropriate for a given user. Rather, it is more appropriate to provide information about the valuation standard that enables users to make an informed decision based on their specific facts and circumstances.
© 2016 - Fri Nov 24 05:33:33 EST 2017 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.