Skip to content Skip to footer

Loading Results

2019 lease accounting survey results

Challenges and lessons learned from ASC 842 and IFRS 16 implementations

Want to know what’s on the minds of those transitioning to the new lease accounting standards? More than 900 finance executives participated in PwC’s 2019 lease accounting survey, revealing key challenges and lessons learned from implementing ASC 842 and IFRS 16.

Key survey findings:

  • 48% from non-public companies are moving “full steam ahead” with ASC 842, despite a one-year effective date deferral.
  • 23% from public companies reported still working on aspects of their lease accounting implementation, despite already being subject to the new rules.

Explore the data

Playback of this video is not currently available

Video: Are private companies underestimating the resources needed?

Non-public company highlights

Playback of this video is not currently available

Video: Impact of effective date deferral.

Implementation status

Many from non-public companies (40%) reported their ASC 842 implementation “in progress” while 13% have not yet started. Of those already implementing, 55% reported being halfway done. However, 35% are delaying their implementation to focus on other priorities after the FASB allowed an extra year to comply with the new rules (see video).

Lease accounting team size

Costs & resources

Are non-public companies underestimating the complexity associated with implementation? The majority (74%) estimate spending less than $250,000 on the transition. Those numbers are a sharp contrast to the  much higher costs reported by public companies who have already implemented. Only 22% of those from non-public companies reported implementation teams of 5+ people (see chart), compared to 48% for public company respondents.

ASC 842 implementation challenges

Implementation challenges

Ensuring completeness of lease population and identifying embedded leases topped the list of non-public company implementation challenges (see chart). Systems issues didn’t rate as high despite 51% of non-public company respondents reporting system changes or implementing new systems to enable the reporting required under ASC 842. These results stand in contrast to the systems experiences of public company survey respondents.

Public company highlights

Playback of this video is not currently available

Video: Lease accounting system implementation status.

Ongoing systems issues

The survey responses from public companies were collected mostly from those already done with their implementation — or are they? Despite being past their effective date, many reported ongoing issues with their implementation. Of the 72% that have implemented new or modified existing systems to account for leases under the new standards, 31% are still exploring system enhancements or alternatives. Also, 70% cited manual work-arounds required for lease reporting following their initial system implementation.

Playback of this video is not currently available

Video: ASC 842 challenges, post-compliance.

"Day 2" challenges

Automating new lease reporting processes was the most challenging post-compliance implementation issue, with 77% of public company respondents rating it as somewhat or very difficult. Ongoing data capture was the second most challenging (see video). Strengthening controls only ranked as a mid-level challenge, consistent with the majority (61%) reporting having already implemented lease accounting controls as revealed elsewhere in the survey.

ASC 842 cost

Costs & resources

ASC 842 implementation costs of $1 million or more were estimated by 21% of public company respondents, increasing to 43% for those with 1,000 or more leases (see chart). More than one-third (35%) expected to spend more than originally budgeted or anticipated. Meanwhile, implementation teams of 5 or more were reported by 48%, increasing to 75% for those with 1,000 or more leases. All of these numbers stand in sharp contrast to non-public companies, which expected significantly lower resources and costs for their implementations.

Insights from the “groundbreakers”:
Public companies share implementation lessons learned

Public companies already reporting under ASC 842 or IFRS 16 can offer invaluable insights to non-public companies still implementing the new standards. The 2019 lease accounting survey asked these “groundbreakers”:

“What aspect of your lease accounting implementation (if any) would you do differently if given the chance to do it over?”

More than 200 financial executives responded with more than 7,000 words of wisdom. The most common themes among the responses involved starting earlier and lessons learned regarding systems implementation and selection. Examples of some responses are highlighted.

Lease accounting lessons

About this survey

  • Responses were collected using an open online survey during September/October 2019.
  • More than 900 finance professionals participated from a range of industries, with a majority (66%) coming from the industrial products/manufacturing; technology/media/telecommunications; financial services and retail/consumer sectors.
  • 79% reported their title as CFO, controller or finance/accounting director or manager.
  • 70% were from public companies.
  • 92% were US GAAP reporters.
  • 59% were from companies with revenue of $1 billion or more.
  • 59% lease fewer than 500 assets.

Contact us

Rich Fournier

Partner, Accounting Advisory, PwC US

C.J. Finn

Partner, Private Company Services, PwC US

Dustin Osgood

Partner, Data and Process, PwC US

David Shebay

Partner, Finance and Systems, PwC US

Follow us

Whether you’re still transitioning to ASC 842 or are already reporting under the new lease accounting standard, our PwC specialists are here to help.

Required fields are marked with an asterisk(*)

By submitting your email address, you acknowledge that you have read the Privacy Statement and that you consent to our processing data in accordance with the Privacy Statement (including international transfers). If you change your mind at any time about wishing to receive the information from us, you can send us an email message using the Contact Us page.