WEBVTT

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:07.760
If you're a CEO, what's on your mind? At PwC,

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:17.680
we asked and more than 4,000 global business leaders told us.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.520
Leaders are less confident about revenue growth than they were last year.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.680
They see rising threats from macroeconomic volatility,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:37.520
cyber risk, technology disruption, and geopolitical conflict.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:43.440
AI is at the top of the agenda, and 12% of CEOs say their company has seen both cost

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:50.080
and revenue benefits from AI, but more than half haven't yet seen any of those gains.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:02.640
But there is plenty of positive news. The CEOs who continue to invest boldly are pulling

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.440
ahead. More than 40% say their organizations have entered new sectors

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:16.080
over the past five years. On average, these moves account for around 20% of their revenue.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:24.000
Half of CEOs say innovation is central to their strategy. Those using

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:29.680
proven innovation practices such as supporting higher risk initiatives and creating innovation

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:38.400
hubs are more profitable and growing faster. Finally, growth is built on trust. Our survey

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:43.680
shows that in the past year, two-thirds of CEOs faced stakeholder concerns around issues like

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:49.200
data privacy and responsible AI. Companies facing the fewest trust

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:55.280
concerns delivered higher returns. Trust, innovation, and reinvention are the

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:02.960
foundations of growth in the age of AI. So our final question to CEOs is this.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:17.040
As you lead through change and disruption, how will you shape what comes next?

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:22.640
Good evening and welcome to you all. Thank you for joining us here in Davos. If you're joining us on

0:02:22.640 --> 0:02:30.640
the live stream, thank you to you, too. We're here to launch PwC's 29th global CEO survey

0:02:30.640 --> 0:02:38.160
and it's taken in responses from almost four and a half thousand CEOs from 95 countries. So that's a

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:44.320
huge survey. Really good data there. I'm Nisha Ple and it's my great pleasure to be your moderator

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.200
today. So what are we going to do? We're going to take a look at the headline findings and then

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:54.880
we're going to try and unpack them to see what they might mean for decision makers at

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:02.080
a time like this with such rapid technological change and so much uncertainty. So I'm pleased

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:08.800
to say that we're joined now by Muhammad Kande, PwC's global chairman. Muhammad, please come onto

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:18.240
the stage. Thank you. Make yourself comfortable. I will. So, let's start

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:24.400
with what the CEOs themselves are saying. Here's a flavor. Our transformation is underway,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:30.320
but it's not going fast enough. Interesting. There's a lot of excitement around AI shared

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:37.280
by all of us in the room, but the payoff isn't here yet. How about this? Long-term survival isn't

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:44.960
guaranteed if we continue on our current path or growth opportunities aren't where they used to be,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:53.760
so we're having to branch out. And finally, doing nothing feels like the bigger risk right now. And

0:03:53.760 --> 0:04:01.680
here's some of the data behind those sentiments. Also pretty striking. Only 30% of CEOs are feeling

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:10.160
confident about revenue growth this year. Only 30%. 56%—over half—say they have not seen cost or

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:21.440
revenue benefits from AI and 66% of CEOs—two-thirds—say they've experienced stakeholder trust issues

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:27.920
in the past year. So Muhammad, when you look at what the CEOs are saying and when you look at what

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:33.760
the data is saying and put it all together what's the real story here? You know Nisha the real story

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:40.640
is that CEOs today are feeling the pressure—the pressure of understanding the current environment

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:46.560
the opportunities but also the sense of urgency that we now have because the more you are in

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.440
a very uncertain environment the more there's a sense of urgency to understand okay what should

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:57.520
come next and Today, unfortunately for many CEOs, it is very difficult to predict what the

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:02.000
future is going to be. And so, they're feeling the pressure. And how do we deal with that pressure

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:07.760
today of all the uncertainty, the technology disruption that you just mentioned, but also to

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.720
think about how do they reshape the business for the long term, reshape it, reshape it because they

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:17.120
know that they will have to do things differently. So, the question that the CEOs are asking

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:23.840
themselves, which is showing up in the results, is am I moving fast enough? Am I being bold

0:05:23.840 --> 0:05:31.600
enough and am I building my business today to be viable for the future for the next five years all

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:37.600
in the midst of maximum uncertainty it is a very interesting time today but the questions are real

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.800
and the answers are difficult indeed and CEOs are under so much pressure caught up in the moment

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:48.480
and decisions perhaps they're missing the big picture so you've identified these deep shifts

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:53.520
that you think that leaders should be across and understand the survey is also providing strong

0:05:53.520 --> 0:06:00.320
support for that. The first shift is what you call the reconfiguration of global economic power with

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:06.800
supply chains shifting, new investment corridors emerging and interestingly CEOs are signaling

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:12.320
growing interest in India and in the Middle East. How do you see this playing out? Well,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:18.480
you know this reconfiguration is playing real time. You mentioned supply chains, reconfiguration

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:25.440
of economic power, reconfiguration of partnership that CEOs actually have to embrace

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:31.760
and the shift happening not only real time but with the level of intensity but also playing it

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:36.480
differently depending on where whether you find yourself in India, in Asia or in in Europe or in

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:42.720
in the US. What we are seeing that the response is first what are the operating models of the future

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:48.240
for CEOs because the reconfiguration will happen is to understand which operating models would be

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:54.720
the right for the future. The second one is to rethink where do we build our products? How do

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.200
we configure our supply chains? Who should we partner with and also what technology

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:04.400
to choose depending on where they find themselves in the world. So this reconfiguration is real and

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:09.840
again we are doing all this in a time of maximum uncertainty about what comes next. So there are

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:16.000
big decisions on the horizon and when you look at where CEOs are placing their bets globally

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:22.880
what's changed recently are leaders thinking differently maybe about about risk and return

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:29.200
you know I like my my colleague Marco Amitrano who is a UK and Middle East senior partner to answer

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:34.000
that question. Marco what do you think about this one? So look, I think it's fair to say, Muhammad,

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:40.640
the competition for investment capital is a global one. It always has been. And look, the

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:45.920
landscape has changed. You know, as you've already articulated, emerging economies are no longer

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:51.920
emerging. Actually, that landscape has changed as a result of the mega trends we've been talking

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:57.440
about, reading about for decades now. You know, geopolitical fracturing, very real, very

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:03.680
current as we come into this week. Technological advancement getting more rapid—we think AI is

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:08.880
huge; we'll hear more about that. Quantum, when it comes, is arguably an even bigger shift. And then we

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:15.200
have social instability, demographic shifts—some of the western economies have felt the pinch more—

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.280
and climate change which, you know, some people think has gone away, but it hasn't. It's now

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:26.000
underpinning an energy transition conversation. So you know the landscape for returns has shifted and

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:32.640
therefore the competition has intensified differently in different places. How do you

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:38.000
think leaders are thinking differently about risk and return today then? Yeah, look, I mean, when

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:43.280
this environment we we're in, there's no doubt that chief execs I talked to, we talked to, many

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:50.240
of which have underpinned their survey, are looking for that kind of balance between fewer

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:57.200
bigger bets, meaningful bets, and therefore bigger but fewer in number, but balancing that

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:03.520
with not betting the house, being able to manage that risk profile. And look, I mean that's where

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:09.760
you do look at the geopolitical landscape. You do look at the interconnectivity of the world.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:15.200
Interestingly, what we see in this survey is the US still the number one destination.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:21.680
So when we ask our CEOs in this survey which are your top three, the US still

0:09:21.680 --> 0:09:28.400
predominantly the first choice with an even bigger lead from 30 to 35%. The UK still holding second

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:34.240
place although that's now shared with Germany and shared with India that's doubled in its popularity

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:40.160
you know relatively we've also seen the Middle Eastern countries even China market themselves

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:45.280
better in that global competition on that global landscape so again illustrating the first comment

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:51.520
I made that the attraction of global capital is a global competition that needs

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:56.800
marketing and stepping up nation by nation. Yeah. Excellent. Great, thanks so much Marco. Actually,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:04.880
the CEO survey results are also backing up what Marco just said. 42% of CEOs say that they've

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:10.480
been entering new sectors recently. If you look at say the last four or five years and those who

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:15.440
have are seeing higher margins, they are also more confident about growth. So what do you

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:20.240
think is driving that trend? Muhammad actually three things are driving that trend. The first

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:26.000
one is growth because most of the CEOs know that when they run the companies they have to look

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.400
for growth. That's how they unlock additional investment capital and you name it. Right? That's

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:36.800
the first point. The second one is technology. Technology has decreased the barriers to entry

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:43.760
into many other industries. So now that you have a lot of companies have access to that technology,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:49.280
technology is a lever that they use to expand into other industries. And the third thing is

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.840
a convergence of industry. You have a lot of industries today that are converging. What

0:10:53.840 --> 0:11:00.320
is a healthcare industry? It's a combination of hospital services, medicine, but also technology.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:06.080
So industries are being redefined. So that is why today many of the CEOs that are looking for growth

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:10.720
know that for them to continue to grow, they have to expand into other industries. That's

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.440
and technology is a lever that they use for that. Indeed. There's a lot of discussion

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.720
at the moment about Europe—of course Europe's place in the world and challenges ahead. But what

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.760
does the survey say about how CEOs view Europe as a business destination? You know the best

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:35.280
person to answer this question is actually our PwC Europe senior partner Petra. Please. Hey Nisha,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:41.120
thanks for the question and to give some insights. What we see is that Europe is still

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:49.520
struggling to adapt to that new geopolitical situation, to the new power competition I

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:56.640
would say we see in the world. At the same time there is an overcapacity coming from China

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:03.200
and this is threatening European companies' market share globally and domestically. And

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:10.480
we are obviously in a new discussion of US tariffs. But I wouldn't write off Europe

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:16.480
yet. There is a lot of positives. So the first thing is, and Marco just said it,

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:24.720
seven out of the global top destinations for investments are in Europe. Second, all the

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:31.920
international companies want to serve the more than 450 million customers in Europe.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:39.280
And taking that one step further, we see—and this is coming from our survey—we see a

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:47.520
sign of a new innovation wave building up. What do I mean? Close to half of the European

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:56.320
CEOs we have surveyed shared that they started venturing into new sectors, in

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:01.760
new industries, and in new business models. So they want to grab the opportunities we see in

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:08.480
the vast investments of AI, of defense, of infrastructure. So this is the destination

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:15.760
they're going towards and maybe if you then look at European companies, they might not

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:21.520
always be the first going for new trends, but once they tackle the opportunity, they do

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:27.360
it consistently and with high quality. So this is what we're seeing and this is why I'm optimistic.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.080
It might take a little bit of time, but the train is out of the station. Okay, Petra, thanks

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:37.040
very much. So, we are not writing off Europe at all. Okay, it sounds like that. Sounds

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.200
like that. And moving into new sectors just like other businesses around the world. So,

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:46.400
let's step back now and look at the second big shift that you've identified: an increasing

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:52.560
overlap—or what you call a tightening link—between technology on the one hand and geopolitics. We're

0:13:52.560 --> 0:13:59.440
seeing fragmented digital ecosystems. CEOs are now ranking cyber risk as a top threat. What

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:05.840
are the implications for business? You know, the reality is nowadays in this current environment,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:12.720
a technology choice is also a geopolitical choice because of the availability of technology in

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:18.480
different parts of the world and cyber risk is a function of the macro volatility that we're

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.880
currently experiencing around. So CEOs are now finding out that depending on where they

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:28.000
operate in the world, who they work with and what they sell, they have to make

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:33.360
very different technology choices. So what we are inviting them to do is to understand what's available to

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:38.880
them, to understand the implication of the choices that they have to take—especially the geopolitical

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:45.280
choices—but most importantly for business is to build the resilience that they need to continue to

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:50.960
run the businesses today but also in the future. But now unfortunately with the geopolitical

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:57.520
landscape that we are living with, a technology choice depending on who they work with is also a

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:02.800
geopolitical choice. Yeah. And that has its own resilience and risk issues in it. Absolutely. So

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:08.480
we haven't yet mentioned AI—of course it's one of the huge shifts which we're all aware of. It's

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:13.440
impossible to go anywhere without AI popping into the conversation let alone here in Davos.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:18.240
So the CEO survey is actually giving us a bit of a mixed picture of what's happening within

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:26.400
businesses. Only 12% of CEOs say that they've seen both cost reductions and revenue benefits as a

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:34.560
result of AI implementation. So very few. Over half—50%—haven't seen either yet which suggests that

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:40.560
most companies are still pretty early in their AI journey, right Muhammad. So what separates the

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:46.960
early movers from everyone else? You know this one when you think about AI we are

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:53.120
in an inflection point. So first of all the technology is working. There's no doubt about it

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:58.800
and it is here to stay. There's no such thing as turning back from artificial intelligence. It's

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.360
like saying that you turn back from the internet. Nobody can do that today. So we know that it is

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:11.360
at an inflection point when it comes to adoption and the understanding that AI is now a must for

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:18.080
organizations or for companies around the world to adopt. The question is how we have to move

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:23.600
and we have seen that the companies that have not adopted AI at scale that are still experimenting

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.880
are showing different results from the companies that are using AI to transform their businesses.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:34.800
So it's not enough to tinker. Yeah. No more. Okay. So let's explore that a bit further then.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.640
What's holding companies back then from, you know, a full immersion? Uh and what are those leaders who

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.440
are seeing value doing differently? How is their thought process different? That is a

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:50.880
great question. Paul, you want to take it? This is Paul Riggs, senior partner for PwC in the US.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:58.320
Happy to and it'll expand upon something, Muhammad, that you just said. If I step back and say

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:05.120
what's keeping companies grounded with AI at the moment, it is being stuck in experimentation mode.

0:17:05.120 --> 0:17:12.000
And I'd argue that you have to layer on with weak AI foundations. You know, the

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:20.240
process of continuing to run the litany of use cases distracts focus. It distracts capital

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:27.520
investment and you need scale plays—top down directed inside businesses—embedded in workflows,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:35.120
not layered on top. And so what I would surmise from the data is that those that do not recognize

0:17:35.120 --> 0:17:39.600
either cost synergies and opportunities in the current environment or the revenue opportunity

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:45.520
that exists and that shows itself in many cases are those that are still experimenting. In terms

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:50.720
of AI foundations, what we certainly encourage clients to build are: one, ensure that you have

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:56.000
the technical foundation and layer to enable your business to maximize its potential with AI.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:03.360
Two, put tools and assets and accelerators in the hands of your people and expect your people

0:18:03.360 --> 0:18:10.880
to experience, to understand, to upskill their own potential. But then three, you have to embed AI,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:19.120
that AI-first ethos into your workflows. Layering things on top after you've run legacy process,

0:18:19.120 --> 0:18:24.160
well, that just keeps you in legacy process. It's incrementally additive rather than transformative.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.720
So, I'd say that in the first instance, you also talked about what are we seeing companies

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:35.280
do who are in fact driving real value. And those companies are doing what I've just described. One,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:40.720
they've got strong AI foundations, which not only means the technologies enhanced their people, not

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:46.480
only means they've upskilled their people, but it means they've developed responsive risk programs,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:54.160
appropriate controls that govern, monitor, secure, enable trust in AI. And then they are embedding AI

0:18:54.160 --> 0:19:01.600
in end-to-end workflows. Yes, transforming what they do today as they build tomorrow. Which

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:08.720
also means that they are committing real resource capacity dedicated to past capacity to transform

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:14.800
underlying businesses and to transform what it is that they do for their clients with measurable

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:20.000
key performance indicators and accountability through the organization. So this isn't rocket

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:27.440
science but it is focus yields results. Focus alongside investment alongside resource capacity

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:32.400
which remains human delivers results with AI and it is meaningful. What we didn't talk about

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.840
are the 30 plus percent of companies who do see meaningful results on the revenue side or on the

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:44.320
cost side. Thank you Paul and Nisha one thing that I will add: this need for business transformation

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:51.360
when using AI, it is the same thing that happened when we moved into digital transformation—when

0:19:51.360 --> 0:19:57.520
you use technology to move on the internet, with the mobile internet, with enterprise resource

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:03.840
planning systems, CRM systems. The technology was not used by itself; we needed to drive

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.000
the business transformation that went along with the technology around people and processes. So

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:12.720
yeah that movie had played out before. Yeah. So you have to run your whole business differently. That's

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:18.880
exactly what it is. So that begs the question: how are you using AI within PwC? You know, what have

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:24.000
you learned internally about what works and what doesn't work? You know everything that we just said

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:29.280
about what we've had our clients, we actually did it to ourselves first—using artificial

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:35.760
intelligence and embedding artificial intelligence in all of our services to become AI-first, training

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:41.040
our people. The first thing we did by the way was to give access to—when ChatGPT came out—

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:47.280
we gave—we have more than 300,000 people today using ChatGPT or access to Microsoft Copilot,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:53.840
for example. Why? Because what we needed to do is to make sure that our people did not fear the

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:59.600
technology and you know people fear what they don't understand. So we had first to make sure

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:04.880
that the tools were available to our people. Yeah. So you have to create AI-native—you have

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.920
to create—if you want AI-native services you have to create AI-native people, but you have to give

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:14.720
them access to the technology. That's the first thing that we had to do. The second thing: how

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:19.520
do we use AI to run our own businesses? You know, with the people that we have around the world,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:27.680
we happen to be 364,000 people in 139 countries. We have to run our business differently and we

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:32.000
are using AI as a lever for us to be able to do that. And the third thing that I will mention

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:38.160
is that we are constantly learning—learning from the technology companies that are always coming

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:44.480
up with innovation on the AI front, so that we are a very early adopter of some of the new

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:50.080
agentic AI services or technologies that are coming out because we want to be leading from

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.000
the front on this one. Okay. Well, I'm going to leave it there on AI because I'm sure you'll

0:21:54.000 --> 0:22:00.640
get more questions later and let's move on now to what you believe that CEOs should be doing. Now,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:06.880
the survey is showing both caution and ambition. Confidence is down, yes, but CEOs are still

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:14.160
investing in innovation, AI, new sectors as we've heard. So, what guidance are you giving to

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:20.160
business leaders about how to navigate through these very difficult turbulent times? So, when

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:29.120
you let me start with artificial intelligence, then CEOs have to move beyond experimentation.

0:22:29.120 --> 0:22:34.960
We mentioned it. Yeah, we hear you. Yeah, that is—it's good to have use cases but that

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.440
was the last two years. We now have to move to the point that we're saying okay how do

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:44.560
we run businesses differently and even if they don't have the answer they have to keep moving—

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:50.080
that is the first thing. The second thing: we really advise CEOs to now look at—now that you have that

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:55.360
technology available to them—use the technology to start thinking about expanding your

0:22:55.360 --> 0:23:02.560
business to grow beyond your sector. AI creates a number of opportunities not only internally to be

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.840
efficient but externally to be able to grow the businesses. That's the second advice. And the third

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:15.680
one: we are basically telling CEOs that you have to make innovation a core capability because

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:21.600
you have to create the new but most importantly you need to have trust in how you deliver—

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:26.320
how you run your businesses differently—and trust is a matter of discipline and that is

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:31.280
what we are telling CEOs today. Trust is a matter of discipline. Yeah, trust is a matter of

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.160
discipline—it's not a one-off; you have to do it all the time. Innovation is a matter of structure.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:42.000
Trust is a matter of discipline and we're asking CEOs to do both and the ones that are able to do

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:47.280
that are the ones that we see successful. Fascinating. I'd never thought of it that way. Um

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:54.960
now a very unexpected insight at least to me is how CEOs are allocating their time. Nearly half is

0:23:54.960 --> 0:24:00.880
being spent on short-term issues with a horizon of less than a year. That's pretty surprising,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:06.480
isn't it? What does that tell you about leadership at the moment? This is a reflection on

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:12.160
how fast things are changing. A lot of the CEOs are spending a lot of time in the day-to-day or

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:17.280
within the one-year time frame because there's no such thing even as a one-year time frame. Things

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:23.120
are changing more frequently. Therefore, they have to—this is a function of being agile for

0:24:23.120 --> 0:24:27.680
them and being reactive to the current environment that they have—and the rest of the time they have

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.760
to think about the long term. It's a balancing act and I would tell you this is a test of leadership

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:37.920
today. Yeah. About the ability to think about today with the uncertainty and the speed of

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:42.000
change but also to think about—you've got to have the strategy as well. You have to do both. You

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:47.360
have got to do both. Shall we have some questions then from our guests here? We've got a mic—a

0:24:47.360 --> 0:24:53.280
roving mic. So why don't we start from the front and then slowly make our way to the back if

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:59.200
possible. Just put your hand up and we'll bring the mic to you. And don't forget to tell us who

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:08.080
you are and which organization you represent. Who would like to start? Thank you. Sorry. Thank

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:13.680
you. I'm Holga Ali from Swiss Business Publication 100 Sait. I would like to come back to the US for

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:20.960
a moment. If I'm not mistaken, you said that US is still the number one destination for new

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:28.560
investments and that the share has even risen. So it's even more attractive—which isn't that

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:36.240
a little bit surprising, knowing that the administration behaves like a third world country

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:42.720
in state capitalism, telling companies what to do and what not. So this is something that shouldn't

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:50.080
raise the attractiveness of an investment destination—or is it too early to see that effect

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:55.440
in your survey? Would like to know that. Thank you. Thanks for your question Holga. So why is

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.920
America still so attractive? So you know you have actually some fundamentals that exist out there. We

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:05.600
have had a lot of conversations with many of the organizations that are investing in the US today,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:11.440
whether private equity, sovereign funds for example, or principal investors, and we

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:17.200
asked the question. And today the reason the number is growing is because the fundamentals of the

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:23.200
US economy and the companies that they're investing in are still very strong. You look at the balance

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:28.400
sheet of a lot of the companies in the US, the cash flow statement, do they have access to

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:33.840
capital and the discipline that they use to run their businesses. You know, when you invest, you

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:38.320
invest in a company, you invest in an opportunity, not only in the country at the macro level. And

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:44.240
that's what we're seeing in the US because today it's a country that still demonstrates a lot

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:48.800
of good fundamentals in business in the US today. That's what we're seeing today. And that's

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:57.120
the reason why they continue to invest. Let's have another question at the back over there.

0:26:57.120 --> 0:27:02.800
Please tell us who you are, sir. Hello, John Paul Ford Rockhouse from the Daily Mail in the UK.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:09.120
Can I just ask on another topic related to the US what your reflections are on the events

0:27:09.120 --> 0:27:16.800
of the last few days relating to Greenland and whether you have made any

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:24.080
representations to the US administration or indeed to the European Union about how they

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:31.680
handle the issue. So this is about the CEO survey. So let's see if we can tempt Muhammad

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.280
to make a comment there. But I wouldn't be surprised if he says no comment. Let's see

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:42.560
what he says. Hey, didn't we say that thing is changing very quickly? That's what it is. So yeah,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.560
I don't think he wanted to bite on your question. I'm terribly sorry. Let's have

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:55.440
another question then here in the front. Thank you from CBC Turkey.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.920
I remember last year it was, I think, the CEO of Salesforce saying that we are the last

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:12.560
generation of CEOs managing real people. Are the CEOs ready for what is next? I am ready.

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:18.160
It depends where you find yourself in the world. But I think there are statements being

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:23.360
made saying that we have to adopt technology very fast and we are all going to find ourselves where

0:28:23.360 --> 0:28:28.880
we will have to run businesses in many countries, in many territories, basically where you have to

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:34.240
use people but you also have to use technology. The two will have to be combined to be able

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.080
to deliver the value of the future—whether it's on the cost side but also on the revenue side.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:44.000
So it's a statement to convey the fact that there is no turning back when you think about

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.640
the adoption of artificial intelligence agents. We have a lot of them today and we will continue

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.360
to have them but we also have a lot of people and we continue to hire a lot of people because

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:59.680
we need them to deliver against our strategy for ourselves but also for our clients. Okay,

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:05.440
I think we've got a question right here. Please tell us who you are. Thank you very much.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:11.200
Shasmosman from the German financial daily Handelsblatt and I would like to know: I think part

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:19.360
of your results is also that German companies try to find European alternatives to US

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:25.600
technology. I would like to know if this is some movement or interest you see also in

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:32.160
other parts of the world and if you think that the new developments we see geopolitically

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:38.960
could increase it and then maybe make the US economy a little bit less attractive for

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:44.000
investments. Thank you very much. No this is a good question but I would tell you what

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.480
we have witnessed. We are not going to profess to know what companies are going to do in the future

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:55.760
based on current geopolitical situations or actions being taken. I would tell

0:29:55.760 --> 0:30:00.640
you what we have seen currently: a lot of the companies—not just in Europe, by the way, there are

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:05.680
companies across the world; it could be in the US, it could be companies in Europe, it could be

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.720
companies in Asia—the function of technology is not where you are based out of, it's where

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:15.600
you operate. And depending on where they operate they will decide what is the best technology

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:21.120
that is more appropriate for the environment: the technological environment, the data environment,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.800
and the regulatory environment for them to use the technology. That's what we have seen

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:30.080
drives the technical decision or technology decision of companies. We have not seen yet

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:35.360
geopolitical actions driving technology decisions. But again, we're not going to predict the future.

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:40.640
Nobody can do that. But I can just share what we have seen so far. Thanks, Muhammad. And I think

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:47.600
there's a question over there wearing a white shirt and glasses. Please tell us who you are.

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.840
Good evening. I'm Rory Reynolds from The National in Abu Dhabi. Do we need to have

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:58.400
a long hard look at how well equipped a lot of traditional CEOs are to manage this digital AI

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.880
transformation because some of them do seem very traditional and I think maybe some of

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:10.480
their employees agree. Thank you. Would one of you like to take it? Marco, come on up. Marco,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:18.000
I was the last person to turn away there, but look, do we—look—CEOs are upskilling? CEOs need to

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:24.640
upskill like everybody else. And I think some will make that journey effectively, some will find it

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:31.840
harder. You know, some may give up. I think there's never been a more important time for

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:37.200
teams leading organizations, not individuals. The CEOs that we see—along with some of those

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:44.880
statistics—are deploying, as Paul described, AI more broadly into the organization deeper; they've gone past the pilots.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.520
You know, those are CEOs that are listening to everybody around them and they're backing what

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:54.320
their people are telling them and they're getting those results early. So, you know, again, I

0:31:54.320 --> 0:32:00.320
think we talk in our organization—as the four leaders of the global network—that we must be learning every day and I think that is

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:05.120
a principle that CEOs, as these changes accelerate, have to adopt themselves. Yeah, agility is key to

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:11.760
the point around that. Can we run businesses today the way we ran them in the past? And that's

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:18.240
applied to many CEOs around the world, right? The answer is no, we can't. Things are changing so fast,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:25.120
and it's a different environment—technology-wise and geopolitically—and we have to adapt.

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:30.560
But the first thing to adapt to a situation, you have to learn from it. That's what Marco just

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.240
said and that's what we see the successful CEOs are doing today, and then to have

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:39.520
a plan but most importantly not to stop executing and to have the ability to pivot when we get

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:45.680
new information. The thing—the job—and we said it earlier, Paul said it, every

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:52.480
CEO today has to run their businesses. They have to transform the business they have today and they

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:58.400
have to think about the future at the same time in an environment that is evolving very very rapidly.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:05.120
It's a new test. It's hugely challenging. Yeah, without a doubt. Let's have a question from

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:10.240
someone a little further back first. Maybe a blonde lady. I can't quite see you or

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:15.360
maybe—sorry it's my eyesight. Yeah, you could probably even see back there. Nish

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:20.720
Bandic from German weekly Stern. I wanted—it's a simple question—just: is climate change still a

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:29.360
topic for CEOs and still a topic in your survey? Indeed it is and I think Marco

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:36.240
mentioned it, didn't you, earlier? Yeah, please. So maybe I can go on that one. Yeah, it's still

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:42.080
a topic. And so what we are seeing is—also coming from our investor survey—that companies

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:49.120
are challenged how to translate technology into—and including technology working for—

0:33:49.120 --> 0:34:00.720
sustainability for sustainable business. So it's a business topic. It has become

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:07.360
a business topic and so we see it still on the radar. It has become a different notion. You

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:12.720
might have seen it also here in Davos. It's not off and we see the businesses changing for the

0:34:12.720 --> 0:34:18.480
future. They are tackling their business and looking at what the business model can be as

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:25.680
a USP, taking up sustainability for a sustainable future of the business model in itself. So

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:31.920
the topic has become a different drive but it's not off. And as we heard earlier,

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:39.520
I mean impact risk of sustainability has moved towards energy transition; it is still there. So

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:45.440
you are asking a—you said a simple question. I think the answer is not so simple for the

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:52.160
business leaders. So we see them also taking it on but having some difficulties with it.

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.920
But it's still there. Thanks Petra. Thank you Petra. And I think there are quite a

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:02.560
few other people. Yes please. In the middle there in a cream jacket. Thank you. I'm from

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:10.240
China Service. My question is simple: how inclusive can AI become a new engine of economic

0:35:10.240 --> 0:35:16.880
growth from the perspective of CEOs? Thank you. Can you—could you just repeat that question?

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:25.040
How inclusive—how inclusive can AI become a new engine of economic growth? How inclusive can

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:30.160
AI drive economic growth? Okay, thank you. Oh, looks like Paul is very keen to answer that. Yeah,

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:36.080
happy to—look at him here. I first of all love the question because if you go back to

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:44.640
the differentiating power of AI, listen: the first move is often operational efficiency. The

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:52.640
opportunity for tomorrow is how do you leverage the value of this transformative technology to

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.480
connect more intentionally with consumers, to change the front end of the sales platform, to

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:03.520
change the value equation, to introduce and take advantage of new vectors of value that create

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:12.400
impact for the end customer. And so in terms of AI's power and potential to expand the revenue

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:18.400
opportunity, it is real. And the survey suggests that again 30-ish%—I can't remember the number off

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:26.080
the top of my head—are seeing AI drive revenue opportunity, not just those cost synergies and

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:31.200
the efficiencies that are there as well. So it's a real opportunity. Maybe the only other thing I'd touch on,

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:40.480
and this comes back to inclusion as the enabling power of AI for a

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:47.120
workforce. I mean, listen, I like to think of it as AI really does raise the floor of potential,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:52.800
but it's still the people—it's still the leaders—who raise the ceiling. And so, you know,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:37:02.960
AI being such an accelerant for enabling expertise is certainly exciting for businesses today,

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:07.600
but even more so for what's to come in the future. Yeah. Great, Paul. It's a very nice

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:13.040
image. AI raises the floor, but leaders raise the ceiling. I think we have time. Do you want to say

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.600
one? Yeah, I want to say one more thing around AI for inclusion and depending on where you

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:23.120
find yourself in the world, when you think about artificial intelligence today, what does it do?

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:28.720
It democratizes access to knowledge. So when you think about inclusion, knowledge inclusion—meaning

0:37:28.720 --> 0:37:33.600
that other parts of the world can have access to knowledge that are sitting in different

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:39.600
geographies—and that is for us inclusion for AI: how can we disseminate knowledge across

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:45.280
all of PwC, across all of the countries that we work today so that we can actually include everybody

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:51.040
within that knowledge base? And it's not just us; we see many companies doing the same. So for me AI is

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:55.680
the technology that can be the most inclusive—but inclusion of what? Inclusion to knowledge—because

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:00.960
the more knowledge people have the more innovative they can be and honestly in many economies you can

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:06.720
see new jobs being created etc. It is going to give a shot to many parts of the world

0:38:06.720 --> 0:38:11.680
to join that new AI economy. Why? Because they have access to knowledge. Let's not forget that

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:16.480
when you have access to knowledge, that is how you create the next generation jobs

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:21.520
and a lot of societies also can come out of where they are today and join this AI boom that we are all

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:26.960
witnessing today and the next innovations. That was a cool question. One last question I think we

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.040
have time for and I think it's going to be this lady in the front over here. Thank you. Briefly,

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:39.440
please. Yes. Hi, Aisha from ET Now in India and I just had a question. One of your CEO surveys

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:47.280
said whether the AI capex will make money. When will it and is it fair to put a timeline

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:55.280
to when it will? This is a yes or no question. A simple one. No, it's not. The answer is no. It won't make money. No, no,

0:38:55.280 --> 0:39:02.080
no. The answer is no. Don't put a timeline on it. Okay. Because it continues to evolve. The reason why we're saying

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:07.120
that there is investment when you think about artificial intelligence and you think about all

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.240
the money that people are saying is being spent in

0:39:10.240 --> 0:39:15.280
AI—in what part of AI? In the technology, the large language models, and the agents; in the real estate;

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:23.680
in the data centers; in the chips; in energy; in industrial equipment—that's the AI ecosystem. We're

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:31.760
telling people: do not stop to drive innovation across all of these different layers of the AI

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:37.200
ecosystem. The more innovation you have, the more it will be affordable for companies at large scale

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:43.760
around the world. So, we say don't stop. Don't look for short-term goals. Look

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:49.280
for short-term benefits or short-term outcomes. But we saw the same movie 25 years ago with the

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:55.600
internet, with the mobile internet. Look at where we are today. Many of the companies that

0:39:55.600 --> 0:40:01.280
are on top of all the financial markets today did not exist 25 years ago when we studied the mobile

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:07.040
internet. Let it play out so we can all embrace this new golden age of innovation because of AI.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:14.480
But don't put a time stamp on it because you don't want people, because of short-term goals, to stop

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.960
investing into the future. That's why. So one last final question for you Muhammad. If you had to

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:25.920
leave business leaders with just one message from this year's CEO survey, what would it be? First,

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:34.400
learn about what's happening and learn fast. We cannot solve problems if we don't understand them.

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:41.520
Understanding what's happening geopolitically, what's happening on the technology front. Second,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:47.440
create optionality. Scenario planning is going to be very important, but it is really important not

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:53.600
to freeze but to continue to execute—move beyond experimentation into business transformation. And

0:40:53.600 --> 0:41:01.680
third, agility. If things change, the ability to move very quickly without compromising on

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:08.240
the future. We know it is hard, but it is a new role for leaders around the world. We got to do

0:41:08.240 --> 0:41:14.720
this. Be brave. Be bold. Be brave. Be bold and be agile and be patient, but it's

0:41:14.720 --> 0:41:21.760
okay to fail. Muhammad, thank you very much for joining us. Thank you to all of you for coming

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:27.920
here today in Davos. If you'd like to download the full survey, it's full of nuggets. You can go to

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:33.840
ceosurvey.pwc. Next year, by the way, we will be celebrating the 30th PwC global CEO survey. So,

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:42.800
please do join us again for that big milestone. For now though, from Nisha, from Muhammad, from

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:49.360
all of us on the PwC team here in Davos, thanks for joining us. Goodbye. Thank you.