Learn more about compacts

At issue in Gillette is much more than a state tax matter.  The decision will have ramifications for the over 200 existing interstate compacts addressing matters as wide ranging as environmental control to interstate transfers of violent criminals.  This page provides a broad overview of general information regarding interstate compacts.

For your convenience, we have included links to third party websites addressing interstate compacts.  The views on these websites do not reflect the views of PwC.  We have no control over the nature, content and availability of these sites. The inclusion of any links does not imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Compact case law

Virginia v. Tennessee, 148 U.S. 503, 1893

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/148/503/

Alabama v. North Carolina, 130 S.Ct. 2295, 2010

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/132orig.pdf

Dyer v. Sims, 341 U.S. 22, 1951

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/341/22/

Tarrant v. Herrman,  __ U.S. __, 2013.

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/11-889/

 

Background and history of interstate compacts

http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/drupal/content/interstate-compacts-background-and-history

Compacts as a tool of the game

http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/ncic/ToolGame.pdf

Frequently asked questions

http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/ncic/CompactFAQ.pdf

National Center for Interstate Compacts

http://www.csg.org/ncic/

State-by-state interstate compact membership

http://apps.csg.org/ncic//