Board Composition and Structure: Are directors willing to consider investor input on candidates?

Annual Corporate Directors Survey

860 public company directors responded to PwC’s 2012 Annual Corporate Directors Survey. Of those directors, 70% serve on the boards of companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenue.

Board Composition and Behavior

Our study shows that 91% of directors find new board members through director recommendations, suggesting that directors are more comfortable with individuals recommended by someone they know and trust.

Risk/Crisis Management

A surprising number of boards (37%) have no clear allocation of specific responsibilities for overseeing major risks among the board and its committees.

Strategy

In our study, strategic planning topped the board’s “wish list,” with over 75% of directors wanting to devote more time to it during the next year.

IT Oversight

While directors see the opportunities in emerging technologies like social media, many are uncomfortable with the challenge of effectively overseeing IT strategy and risk.

In light of the key corporate governance issues facing directors, we looked at how they're choosing new board members and to what extent they're looking to shareholder recommendations in the process. Based on our survey responses, here's what we discovered.

Finding new directors

 
  • Ninety-one percent of directors find new members through director recommendations, suggesting a preference for referrals by someone they know and trust. However, 67% use search firms.
  • Directors say their corporate governance communications with shareholders has increased, but only about 11% look to investor recommendations for potential director candidates.
  • Willingness to consider investor input on board candidates is even lower at companies with over $10 billion in revenue, at 6%.
 

What sources do you use to recruit new board members?

What sources do you use to recruit new board members?
 

 

Performance concerns:

  • Nearly one-third of directors (31%) are dissatisfied with a fellow director and feel the individual should be replaced.
  • About half say their reasons for dissatisfaction include aging, which they say has diminished a person’s performance.
  • About 40% believe the director does not have the necessary expertise, and many others cite a lack of preparation for meetings.
  • Directors who have been at the company only one to two years are most likely to believe a fellow board member should be replaced because of aging.
  • Other studies show that both the average age of S&P 500 directors and average board tenure keeps growing. In our study, 35% of directors have been on their current board for over 10 years.

Do you believe that any of your board members should be replaced for the following reasons?


Do you believe that any of your board members should be replaced for the following reasons?

Contacts Mary Ann Cloyd
Mary Ann Cloyd
Leader, Center for Board Governance

View full profile
+1 (973) 236-5332