Our 10 indicators and 60 variables have undergone substantial revision and refinement this year to enrich the meaning of results. As we do every year, however, we “fleshed out” our quantitative research by investigating underlying issues in interviews with leaders of thought and action from all over the world.
This year, we also added a new indicator, City Gateway. It seeks to measure a city’s global attraction.
Intellectual capital, and the innovation it generates, is the engine of both social development and growth. Stockholm and Toronto once again topped the ranking this year.
A new indicator which measures a city's global connection. This indicator tries to quantify a city's global connections and attraction beyond its local borders. London clinched first place, given the city's function as a hub of European travel.
Peter Chamley, Head of infrastructure at Arup, the global design and engineering firm
The competition for digital advantage continues to intensify. Seoul overtakes New York at the very top in this indicator.
Wim Elfrink, Chief Globalization Officer, Cisco
For a city to thrive, its citizens must feel secure. "For the average person in a developing city, the most important factor is safety, health, and security," says Dr. Andrew Chan, deputy chairman, Arup Group. Stockholm and Toronto take first and second place.
Bill Bratton, Chairman, Kroll Inc.
In 2012, findings for this indicator show a major rethinking of the actual role transport and infrastructure play in a city's development and cohesion. Singapore takes first place, with Toronto being the only non-Asian city in the top 5.
Peter Chamley, Head of infrastructure design and engineering, Arup
Natural environment was added to sustainability this year to reflect specific variables of climate or geology over which municipalities have little control. This indicator weighs the effectiveness of public policy, with 9 of the 10 top ranked cities being mature economies with defined sustainability strategies in place. Sydney topped the rankings.
This year the indicator focuses clearly on "livability.” It seeks to approximate and reflect what most people interpret instinctively for themselves. Despite that subjectivity, there seems relatively universal agreement on what makes a "livable" city--or at least which cities are more livable than others. When it comes to judging livable, Paris rises to the top.
David Miller, Mayor of Toronto, 2003-2010
Asia rises, but we'll always have Paris. What is central to the rankings here is the actual clout a city's economy gives it, not merely the cumulative potency of the economy itself. It is no surprise that Beijing rocketed to the very top of the rankings this year.
Peter Chamley, head of infrastructure, Arup design and engineering
Competitive cities know how to stay competitive, using a combination of innovation and human capital with a hospitable and responsive business environment to create a recipe for economic success. Singapore ranks first this year, up from second in 2011.
Bill Bratton, Chairman, Kroll Inc.
Comparative advantage is the bottom line for every city, developing or developed, as the 2012 order tilts eastward.
Peter Chamley, head of infrastructure, Arup design and engineering
Download the Cities of Opportunity 2012 report and research data.
| Download a custom PDF |