Do organisations know what’s out there?
- What are organisations doing to deal with cybercrime?
- 61% said they don’t have or are not aware of having access to forensic technology investigators
- 60% said they don’t have or are not aware of having the in-house capability to investigate cybercrime
- 56% said they don’t have or are not aware of having a media and public relations plan in place
- 46% said they don’t have or are not aware of having controlled emergency network shutdown procedures in place
- 40% said they don’t have or are not aware of having the in-house capability to prevent and detect cybercrime
Keeping an eye on social media sites
- 60% of respondents said their organisation doesn’t monitor the use of social media sites, or they are not aware of any monitoring policies
- How social media sites are monitored (% only of those who do monitor the use of such sites):
- Monitor internal and external electronic traffic including web pages 85%
- Employee contracts cover how to use information and documents properly 62%
- Training programmes 37%
- Typical internal cybercrime fraudster:
- Junior employee or middle manager 84%
- Less than 40 years old 65%
- Employed with the organisation for less than five years 51%
Reducing the risks
- Provision of cyber security awareness training:
- No cyber security training in the past twelve months 43%
- Emails or posters 40%
- Face-to-face training 25%
- Computer-based training 22%
- 60% of respondents said face-to-face training is the most effective form when it comes to cybercrime awareness
Global economic crime survey 2011